ANSI Z535.1 Safety Color Code: Meaning, Compliance & Use

Herbert Post
ansi z535.1 safety color code

Early in my career, I reviewed a hazard posting that used a NOTICE sign for a condition that clearly required a higher signal word. The result was predictable: employees stopped treating it like a serious warning. Color is recognized faster than text, and a NOTICE sign is not built to trigger urgent action. That experience is exactly why the ANSI color code matters.

Key Takeaways

  • ANSI Z535.1 defines standardized safety colors used in signs, labels, tags, floor markings, and pipe markers.
  • The standard improves hazard recognition but does not replace OSHA enforcement rules.
  • ANSI Z535.1-2022 is mainly a clarifying update that keeps the safety color standard aligned with the rest of the ANSI Z535 series.
  • Correct color use reduces confusion, improves response time, and lowers incident risk.

 

What Is ANSI Z535.1?

ANSI Z535.1 is the American National Standard that defines safety color meanings and applications used in visual safety communication. It establishes how colors should be used to identify hazards, safety instructions, equipment conditions, and emergency information.

The standard applies to:

    • Safety signs and labels
    • Facility floor markings
    • Pipe markers
    • Machine guarding labels
    • Product warnings and instruction panels

The ANSI Z535 standard does not regulate enforcement, penalties, or workplace inspections. Instead, it provides a consistent color framework that manufacturers, employers, and designers use to clearly and quickly communicate hazards.

 

ANSI Safety Colors and Their Meanings

The ANSI Z535.1 safety color system is fundamentally based on hazard severity and likelihood, creating a visual hierarchy that allows people to instantly assess danger levels.

trdsf.com/products/workplace-safety-sign-danger-high-voltage-safety-aluminum-sign

Safety Red

red danger signs

Red is used to signal dangerous situations that require immediate action. It identifies hazards where there is a high risk of death or serious injury if the warning is ignored. Red is typically used for:

    • DANGER signs
    • Emergency stop buttons
    • Fire protection equipment, such as fire extinguishers and fire alarm pull stations
    • Emergency shutdown controls
    • Prohibition actions

In 1995, a study of perceptions of hazards found that red conveyed the highest level of perceived hazard more than any other color. That’s why ANSI limits its use so it stays tied to time-critical actions and doesn’t dull the reaction you want when a true emergency stop or prohibition message appears.

In ANSI Z535-formatted safety signs and labels, red is most often used in the signal word panel, symbol background, or prohibition symbol (circle with slash).

Safety Orange

Orange identifies a potentially hazardous situation with a serious risk of injury or death, but the hazard is not as immediate or extreme as those marked with red. It alerts people to dangerous conditions that require attention and safe behavior, but not instant emergency action. Orange is commonly used for:

    • WARNING signs
    • Machine guards and exposed moving parts
    • Crush points, pinch points, and cutting hazards
    • Areas where contact with hazardous equipment could cause severe injury

Orange signals a higher injury risk than yellow, especially where body contact is possible. It instructs people to be vigilant for hazardous machine-related hazards, particularly those that may not be obvious at first glance.

Several common hex codes are used for safety orange, with popular choices being #FF7900, #FF6700, or #FF6600. For digital applications, #FF7900 is the most commonly referenced approximation in ANSI sources.

Safety Yellow

yellow caution signs

Yellow warns of general hazards and conditions that may cause minor or moderate injury. It is less severe than those marked with red or orange, but it still requires awareness and safe behavior. Yellow is widely used on:

    • CAUTION signs
    • Floor markings
    • Low-clearance areas
    • Trip, slip, and fall hazards
    • Moving equipment paths

Safety yellow is easy to see and widely associated with alertness. I remember reviewing near-miss reports in a distribution center where visibility was a recurring issue. After we standardized yellow floor markings for step-downs, aisle crossings, and uneven surfaces, those visibility-related near misses became far less common.

Safety Green

green safety information signs

Green does not warn of a hazard. Instead, it identifies safe conditions and emergency response information. It is commonly used for:

    • Emergency exits and exit routes
    • First aid stations and medical equipment
    • Eyewash and safety shower locations
    • Areas or conditions that indicate “safe to proceed”

By dedicating green to safety information and safety-related instructions, ANSI enables fast recognition, communicating to people, "this is safe" or "follow these procedures for safety," during emergencies, even when there is no time to read text.

Safety Blue

blue notice signs

ANSI uses blue to separate instructions from hazard warnings. Safety blue communicates information that tells people what they must do to stay safe. It does not warn of danger by itself. Instead, it supports safe work practices by directing behavior.

Blue is commonly used for:

    • NOTICE signs
    • PPE requirement postings
    • Mandatory action messages, such as “Authorized personnel only”
    • Equipment operation instructions

In chemical plants, we often place blue mandatory PPE safety signage at entry points rather than near the hazard itself. This placement supports compliance before exposure occurs, which I believe is consistent with ANSI’s intent.

Safety Purple

Purple identifies ionizing radiation hazards. It is often shown together with the radiation trefoil symbol and frequently paired with yellow or magenta to increase contrast and worker's recognition. Safety purple is typically used for:

    • Radiation warning signs
    • Areas containing radioactive materials
    • Equipment that emits ionizing radiation
    • Containers and labels for radioactive substances

This color is rarely seen outside healthcare, research, and energy sectors. Its limited use actually supports recognition because workers associate it with a very specific hazard.

Black, White, and Combination Colors

black and white warning signs

Black and white are supporting colors used to maintain contrast, legibility, and structure on ANSI Z535 safety signs. Black is typically used for text and safety symbols, while white is used for backgrounds or negative space.

Combination patterns may appear on signs that mark boundaries or physical hazard zones. For example, black-and-yellow floor striping is widely used to mark pinch zones around automated equipment. When paired with correct lighting, these patterns are visible from a distance and at oblique angles, which is critical in busy production areas.

These colors do not change the meaning of the sign by themselves, but make the primary safety color easier to recognize and read.

 

ANSI Z535.1 Color Specifications

ANSI Z535.1 does not rely on color names like “bright red” or “safety yellow.” Instead, it defines each safety color using objective color specification systems, so colors can be measured and reproduced consistently. The standard uses Munsell notation to describe how a color appears to the human eye, based on:

    • Hue (the color family, such as red or yellow)
    • Value (lightness or darkness)
    • Chroma (color intensity or saturation)

This helps manufacturers and safety professionals describe color appearance in a way that matches visual perception. ANSI also includes CIE colorimetric data, which are mathematical descriptions of color plotted on a color map. These values enable precise measurement with color instruments, support quality control, and verify the produced color falls within an acceptable range.

ansi z535 standards color chart

The PANTONE colors listed above are for reference only and are not the official PANTONE values for compliance. These commonly used approximations assist designers, printers, and vendors in achieving a close match prior to final verification.

 

ANSI Z535.1-2022: Latest Updates You Should Know

The current edition, ANSI Z535.1-2022, was approved in June 2022 and incorporated minor updates aimed at keeping Z535.1 consistent with the rest of the ANSI Z535 family and clarifying how Z535.1 relates to other standards and regulations.

In other words, 2022 is less about changing what “red” or “yellow” mean in your facility and more about making the standard easier to align with the broader Z535 system and external requirements when you’re writing specs, buying signage, or updating a corporate safety style guide.

What Changed in the Prior 2017 Edition (And Why You Still See It Referenced)

Many facilities still cite ANSI Z535.1-2017 because it includes several meaningful structure and usability updates. In the foreword history for Z535.1-2022, the committee explains that the 2017 edition:

    • Harmonized the standard with 49 CFR §172.407 (DOT labeling specifications) and replaced the older single table approach with multiple tables to better account for differences in production methods while keeping colors within recommended tolerances.
    • Put more emphasis on real-world factors that affect appearance (materials, production, lighting, fading) rather than focusing only on technical measurement.
    • Added new annexes designed to be more user-friendly, including an annex comparing ANSI and ISO color boundaries on a chromaticity diagram, plus cross-reference tables that include formats like CMYK and RGB formulas.
    • Noted that Safety Gray and Safety Brown were removed from a key table because they are not considered hazard-alerting colors for accident prevention, even though other signage systems may use them.

The edition you reference matters because it affects how your organization specifies color tolerances, documents purchasing requirements, and defends consistency across safety signs, product safety labels, floor markings, and product materials during audits.

 

ANSI Z535.1 vs OSHA 1910.144 Safety Colors

Topic

ANSI Z535.1

OSHA 1910.144

What it is

A consensus standard that defines safety color specifications used across the ANSI Z535 safety communication system.

A federal regulation that sets mandatory workplace color requirements for certain hazard markings.

Main purpose

Helps organizations use consistent, measurable safety colors across safety signs, labels, tags, and related applications.

Establishes enforceable rules for how specific colors must be used in the workplace for certain hazards.

Legal status

Voluntary unless adopted by contract, policy, or referenced by another requirement.

Enforceable OSHA rule. Noncompliance can lead to citations.

Color scope

Uses a broader ANSI safety color set commonly applied in Z535 systems: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple, plus supporting contrast colors (black/white).

Addresses a more limited set of required workplace marking colors, with primary emphasis on red and yellow. It also includes other workplace marking colors in its text, but it does not function as a full sign/label color system like ANSI Z535.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has proposed rescinding its long-standing Safety Color Code rule, 29 CFR 1910.144, as part of a broader effort to remove or streamline certain requirements. In response, industry voices including groups such as the International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA) have urged OSHA to retain the rule. They are arguing that it still provides a clear, enforceable baseline for marking physical hazards in the workplace.

From a safety professional’s perspective, the issue is less about which standard is “better” and more about clarity and continuity. ANSI Z535 works well as a comprehensive visual communication system, but OSHA’s color code still gives inspectors and employers a shared reference point.

Removing it risks creating gaps where hazards are marked inconsistently or not at all, particularly in workplaces without strong internal standards. On the other hand, retaining the rule helps preserve a common language for physical hazard marking while still allowing ANSI-based systems to support broader safety communication.

How Do ANSI Safety Colors Compare With ISO Safety Color Standards?

Both ANSI Z535.1 and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 3864 share the same core safety colors and their general meanings. The biggest practical difference between these two is in “warning colors.”

ANSI Z535 practice commonly distinguishes orange for higher-risk machine hazards and uses yellow for cautionary conditions. The ISO 3864 safety sign colors, by contrast, treat yellow as the primary warning color for hazards on safety signs. Therefore, the safest approach in mixed environments is to standardize internally and then apply ISO global standard formats where required (export products, multinational sites, customer specs), rather than mixing color meanings within the same site.

 

What Can Go Wrong When Safety Colors Aren’t Used Correctly?

Not following a safety color code doesn’t usually cause a single, obvious failure. But, it creates small points of confusion that can build over time and lead to:

    1. Slower hazard recognition: When safety colors are used inconsistently, people can’t rely on quick visual cues. They have to stop and interpret each sign or marking.
    2. Higher risk during emergencies: Emergencies depend on instant recognition. If fire equipment, exits, or emergency stop controls don’t stand out because colors are misused, response can be delayed.
    3. Training becomes less effective: Safety training relies on repetition and consistency. When the safety color system doesn’t match what people see in the field, training loses credibility and retention drops.
    4. Increased chance of incidents and near misses: Many incidents aren’t caused by missing information, but by unclear or ignored cues.
    5. Inspection and audit issues: During inspections, OSHA officers typically focus on clear hazard recognition. Inconsistent or confusing color use can raise questions about whether hazards are being adequately marked.

📌 Author’s Note: This article provides educational information about ANSI Z535.1 and ISO 3864 safety color standards for general knowledge purposes. It is not a substitute for official standard documents or professional safety consultation. Always consult official published standards (ANSI Z535.1-2022, ISO 3864-4:2011) and qualified safety professionals before implementing safety color systems. Standards are subject to revision, and compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and industry.

 

ANSI Z535.1 FAQs

Under ANSI Z535.1, what color means warning?

ANSI Z535.1 itself defines safety color meaning, not signal words, but in common ANSI Z535 use, orange is associated with warning messages tied to hazardous machine parts or energized equipment, while yellow is used for cautionary conditions. Which one appears depends on the hazard type and severity.

What color warning sign indicates safety instructions?

Green is used to indicate safety instructions that point to safe conditions or safety equipment, such as exits, first aid equipment, eyewash stations, or emergency routes. Blue is used for mandatory instructions, such as required PPE or required actions.

What color is used for warning labels on electrical hazards?

Electrical hazard safety labels commonly use orange when the risk involves exposure to energized components that could cause serious injury, and yellow for lower-level electrical hazards or cautionary conditions. The choice depends on the severity and context of the hazard.

Do different industries use unique safety color codes?

Some industries add internal conventions or supplemental markings, but most still rely on ANSI Z535.1 as the baseline for safety color meaning to keep communication consistent across sites, contractors, and equipment.

Is ANSI Z535.1 required by OSHA?

No. ANSI Z535.1 is not required by OSHA. It is a voluntary consensus standard, though many workplaces use it because it provides a clear, consistent framework that often aligns well with OSHA expectations when hazards are marked clearly.


The material provided in this article is for general information purposes only. It is not intended to replace professional/legal advice or substitute government regulations, industry standards, or other requirements specific to any business/activity. While we made sure to provide accurate and reliable information, we make no representation that the details or sources are up-to-date, complete or remain available. Readers should consult with an industrial safety expert, qualified professional, or attorney for any specific concerns and questions.

Herbert Post

Born in the Philadelphia area and raised in Houston by a family who was predominately employed in heavy manufacturing. Herb took a liking to factory processes and later safety compliance where he has spent the last 13 years facilitating best practices and teaching updated regulations. He is married with two children and a St Bernard named Jose. Herb is a self-described compliance geek. When he isn’t studying safety reports and regulatory interpretations he enjoys racquetball and watching his favorite football team, the Dallas Cowboys.

ENSURE SAFETY WITH PREMIUM SOLUTIONS