Fall Protection PPE Compliance Guide for Safety Managers (OSHA 1910.140 & 1926.104/105)

Key Takeaways

• OSHA standards 1910.140 (general industry) and 1926.104/105 (construction) establish the legal requirements for fall protection PPE, covering personal fall arrest systems, positioning systems, safety belts, lanyards, lifelines, and safety nets.
• A complete fall protection system requires three components working together: an anchorage point capable of supporting 5,000 pounds, body wear such as a full-body harness, and connectors like lanyards or lifelines that limit free fall to 6 feet.
• All fall protection equipment must be inspected before each work shift, immediately removed from service after any impact loading, and employers must have prompt rescue plans to prevent suspension trauma.
• Compliance failures persist not from lack of equipment or training programs, but from gaps between written policy and daily practice, making leadership accountability and consistent enforcement the foundation of effective fall protection.

Why Is Fall Protection PPE Important?

If “everyone knows” falls kill people, why does fall protection keep showing up as the most-cited problem year after year?

In a U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) news release, a roofing worker died after falling 30 feet through an unprotected skylight, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited failures tied to fall protection PPE around skylights and on a low-sloped roof. This is what the “most-cited” pattern looks like in real life: obvious hazards, familiar controls, and basic breakdowns that repeat until somebody pays the price.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently tallied 865 worker deaths from falls, slips, and trips, and 80.9% of them were falls to a lower level. Fall protection has been OSHA's number one concern for a straight 15 years and meanwhile, National Safety Council CEO Lorraine Martin had this to say:

“While progress has been made, the consistency in citation rankings year after year signals that yesterday’s hazards are still today’s vulnerabilities. Employers, safety professionals and communities must intensify efforts through robust training, regular hazard assessments and leadership accountability to protect workers and save lives.”

So where exactly is compliance failing?

One clue I found shows up consistently in CPWR research: establishment size. Roughly 70% of fatal fall injuries occurred at worksites with 10 or fewer employees. Why? Well, in those smaller crews, safety is usually the responsibility of the foreman, and that's a tough ask, especially when you're also trying to keep the work on track. PPE gets passed between workers without formal inspection logs. Nobody's being reckless. There's just no one whose sole focus is on watching for gaps.

To add, I don’t think the cost side of falls gets enough attention. Aside from the human toll, falls are among the most expensive injuries employers face, according to the Liberty Mutual Workplace Safety Index:

• Falls to the same level: $8.9 billion annually
• Falls to a lower level: $6.1 billion annually

Add struck-by incidents from dropped objects, and injuries involving working at height equipment account for nearly half of all workplace injury expenses.

So here's the math: a quality harness, proper training, and routine inspections cost way less compared to what one serious fall will set you back in workers' compensation, OSHA fines, legal fees and lost productivity alone. And that's before you factor in what really matters: the life that didn't make it home.

What Are the OSHA Fall Protection Standards for PPE?

1910.140 – Personal Fall Protection Systems

In general industry, 29 CFR 1910.140 is where OSHA sets the criteria for personal fall protection systems. If you’re relying on fall protection PPE to meet a requirement under the OSHA fall protection standard, this is the section that defines what “acceptable” looks like for the system itself.

This OSHA fall protection standard applies to three types of systems:

1. Personal fall arrest systems: designed to stop a fall after it starts.
2. Positioning systems: used to hold a worker in place on an elevated surface so they can work (often hands-free).
3. Travel restraint systems: set up to keep a worker from reaching the fall hazard in the first place.

From an employer obligation standpoint, the overview is straightforward: if a personal system is your chosen control, the employer is responsible for providing and using a compliant system that meets 1910.140. That’s why purchasing, written policy, and field practice have to line up.

One last difference worth keeping in your head if you move between facility work and construction fall protection: general industry commonly uses the 4-foot trigger in 1910.28, while construction’s widely-cited baseline for unprotected sides and edges is 6 feet under 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1).

You’ll also see ANSI Z359 referenced in vendor specifications for fall protection equipment. OSHA doesn’t turn Z359 into “law” by mentioning it, but it’s commonly used as consensus guidance for performance and testing expectations, and OSHA points to Z359 resources on its fall protection standards page.

1926.104 – Safety Belts, Lifelines, and Lanyards

29 CFR 1926.104 is a construction fall protection standard that sets baseline rules for using safety belts, lifelines, and lanyards as fall protection equipment. OSHA tells you what these items are allowed to be used for, and what has to happen when they get “tested” in the worst possible way.

Here’s what I’d want a supervisor or safety manager to take away from the actual text:

• Lifelines must be secured above the point of operation to an anchorage capable of supporting 5,400 pounds minimum
• Lifelines need a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds (3/4-inch manila rope or equivalent)
• Lanyards must limit free fall to 6 feet maximum
• Hardware (except rivets) must withstand 4,000 pounds of tensile loading without cracking or permanent deformation
• Any working at height equipment subjected to in-service loading during an actual fall gets retired immediately. No exceptions, no re-inspection.

That last point catches some employers off guard. I've seen instances where someone wanted to send a lanyard off for testing after it caught a worker. But OSHA fall protection standard doesn't allow for that. Once it's been loaded in a real fall, its done for good.

1926.105 – Safety Nets

Safety nets work differently from harness-based systems. They're passive. A worker doesn't wear them or clip into them. They just catch anyone who falls.

1926.105 requires safety nets when workplaces are more than 25 feet above ground, water, or another surface, and when other protection methods like scaffolds, catch platforms, or safety belts aren't practical. You'll see them most often in high-rise construction, bridge work, and structural steel erection.

Installation and testing requirements are specific:

• Nets must extend at least 8 feet beyond the edge of the work surface
• They can't be installed more than 25 feet below the work surface
• Clearance underneath must prevent contact with surfaces or structures below
• Operations can't begin until the net is in place and tested

The net itself has to meet defined specifications:

• Mesh openings can't exceed 6 inches by 6 inches
• New nets must demonstrate 17,500 foot-pounds minimum impact resistance with manufacturer certification
• Edge ropes need a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds
• Connections between net panels must develop the full strength of the net
• Forged steel safety hooks or shackles are required for fastening

Most of the sites I've worked with use personal fall arrest equipment as the primary approach. But nets make sense in situations where harness systems would slow work significantly or create their own hazards. A steel erector moving constantly across an open frame, for example, might be better protected by a net below than by repeatedly connecting and disconnecting a lanyard.

For employers, the obligation is clear: if you're using safety nets, they need to be installed, tested, and maintained to these specifications before anyone works above them.

How These Standards Work Together as a Fall Protection System

Three standards, three different scopes. But they're not meant to operate in isolation.

A complete fall protection system has three basic components: (1) an anchorage point, (2) body wear (harness or belt), and (3) connectors (lanyards, lifelines, or nets that link the two). The standards I've covered each address pieces of that system. 1910.140 sets performance criteria for the body wear and connectors in general industry. 1926.104 does something similar for construction, with specific fall protection requirements for belts, lanyards, and lifelines. 1926.105 covers safety nets, which function as both connector and catch system in one.

The practical question for most safety managers: which standard applies to my site?

What this table doesn't show here is overlap. A construction site might need to reference both 1926.104 for harness systems and 1926.105 for nets, depending on the work being done. A general industry facility with maintenance workers on elevated platforms would look to 1910.140, but if those workers are doing construction-type tasks, the construction standards could apply instead.

When I'm advising on working at height equipment selection, I start with the industry and the task, then work backward to the applicable OSHA fall protection standard. The equipment requirements follow from there.

At What Height Is Fall Protection Required?

The short answer is: it depends on which OSHA rule set you’re in. The part people miss is that the trigger height is only half the story. The other half is what kind of exposure you have (edge, hole, dangerous equipment, over water), and what options the rule allows.

⚠️IMPORTANT: OSHA requires fall protection at any height when workers are above dangerous equipment or machinery. A 3-foot fall onto a concrete floor might result in a broken wrist. A 3-foot fall into a vat, conveyor, or running machinery can be fatal. The height trigger disappears when the hazard below makes any fall potentially deadly.

When Is Fall Protection Required in the Construction Industry?

The 6-foot rule is pretty clear on paper but in practice, it shows up in places you might miss.

OSHA Area Director Edward Marshall said in a Department of Labor release:

“By law, workers must use fall protection whenever they work at heights six feet or greater. For that fall protection to be effective, it must be worn correctly, secured and tied off.”

That second sentence matters as much as the first. Just having a harness on site isn't enough. Having it on, but not connected to anything isn't enough either. The 6-foot threshold applies across the board in construction fall protection, but some situations tend to get overlooked:

• Leading edges during floor or roof construction, where the work surface itself is still being built
• Holes in floors, roofs, or walking surfaces, including skylights
• Formwork and rebar assemblies before concrete is poured
• Roofing work, both low-slope and steep-slope, with different fall protection requirements for each
• Scaffolds, which have their own fall protection triggers under Subpart L
• Aerial lifts, where workers must be tied off inside the basket

Each of these has specific provisions in 1926.501, and I've heard of employers getting cited because they assumed a general fall protection program covered everything. It doesn't. Roofing has different allowances than leading-edge work. Scaffold requirements live in a different subpart entirely.

Let me tell you, there are very real consequences if you miss these points. In March 2023, a roofer in Miami Gardens fell 40 feet through a collapsing roof section while moving a wheelbarrow. He died from his injuries. OSHA found that the company had provided no fall protection or personal fall arrest equipment. They received citations totaling $84,379. But the fine isn't really the point. One of the guys doing a routine job ended up dead because the safety systems just weren't in place.

What Does Fall Protection PPE Include?

Body Harnesses and Safety Belts

A full-body harness is the centerpiece of any personal fall arrest equipment setup. Unlike a simple belt, a harness distributes arrest forces across the thighs, pelvis, waist, chest, and shoulders. That distribution is what makes the difference between walking away from a fall and sustaining serious internal injuries.

1910.140 is specific about where you clip in:

• Dorsal D-ring (center back, near shoulder level): Required for fall arrest
• Pre-sternal D-ring (front chest): Permitted only when free fall is limited to 2 feet or less

I've seen workers clip in at the waist or side because it felt more convenient. It's not compliant, and more importantly, it's not safe. A side attachment during a fall can rotate the body and put catastrophic stress on the spine.

What about body belts? Body belts have been prohibited for fall arrest in both general industry and construction. The physics don't work. A belt concentrates all arrest forces at the abdomen, which can cause internal organ damage and doesn't keep the body upright during a fall.

They're not entirely obsolete, though. Body belts are still permitted for:

• Positioning systems, where the worker leans into the belt while working on a vertical surface (lineworkers, rebar installers, tree trimmers)
• Travel restraint, where the system prevents the worker from reaching a fall hazard in the first place

The key distinction: positioning is about keeping you in place while you work, and fall arrest is about catching you after you've already fallen. Different jobs need different equipment, which is why this is so important to get right.

Lanyards and Connectors

The lanyard is what connects you to the system. Get it wrong, and nothing else matters.

OSHA lifeline requirements pretty much define a lanyard as a flexible line (rope, wire rope, or strap) with connectors at each end, linking the harness to a deceleration device, lifeline, or anchorage. The standard lanyard length is 6 feet, and that's not arbitrary. It's calibrated to the 6-foot maximum free fall distance OSHA permits under 1910.140 and 1926.502.

Now here's where I think a lot of people get confused: a 6-foot lanyard doesn't guarantee a 6-foot fall. If you tie off at foot level, your actual free fall becomes the lanyard length plus the distance from your feet to your D-ring. That can easily exceed 6 feet. The fix is simple in principle: tie off at or above D-ring height whenever possible.

Shock-absorbing vs. self-retracting. Two common lanyard types, very different mechanics:

SRLs are more forgiving. Because they limit free fall to inches rather than feet, the arrest force on the body is lower, and the total fall distance is shorter. That matters when clearance is tight. Shock-absorbing lanyards require more room below the worker because the shock pack itself can add 3.5 feet of deceleration distance on top of the fall.

Connectors need to match the job. D-rings, snaphooks, and carabiners all must sustain 5,000 pounds of tensile load and be proof-tested to 3,600 pounds without deformation. Since 1998, only locking snaphooks are permitted in construction. Non-locking types were phased out because of rollout risk, where the gate could be inadvertently depressed and release under load.

Connections to avoid (unless the connector is specifically designed for them):

• Snaphook directly to webbing or rope
• Two snaphooks clipped to each other
• Two snaphooks on a single D-ring
• Snaphook to a horizontal lifeline

These configurations can allow the gate to open unintentionally. If the manufacturer hasn't rated the connector for that specific use, don't assume it's safe.

Lifelines and Anchor Points

At the end of the day, every component in a fall protection system connects back to one point. So the fall protection anchor points have to be able to hold because that's the fixed point the whole system relies on.

1926.502(d)(15) and 1910.140(c)(13) give employers two paths to compliance:

1. 5,000 pounds per employee attached, or
2. A complete system with a safety factor of at least two, designed, installed, and supervised by a qualified person

The 5,000-pound figure sounds extreme, and it is. It's roughly the weight of a full-size pickup truck. But it's calibrated to account for the dynamic forces generated when a falling body suddenly stops. A 200-pound worker falling 6 feet can generate peak arrest forces approaching 1,800 pounds. Doubling that (plus margin) gets you to 5,000.

The second option exists because engineered systems can account for actual expected loads rather than just worst-case assumptions. If a qualified person designs the system and it maintains a 2:1 safety factor against maximum arrest force, that's compliant. In practice, I see this more often with horizontal lifeline installations where the structural calculations get specific.

Vertical vs. horizontal lifelines:

Horizontal lifelines are way more complex than they look. The flatter the line (less sag), the higher the force multiplier at the anchors. At a 15-degree sag angle, forces roughly double. At 5 degrees, they can multiply by six. This is why OSHA requires qualified-person oversight for horizontal systems, and why off-the-shelf solutions need careful evaluation.

A few things I always check:

• Independence: Fall protection anchor points must be independent of any anchorage used to suspend platforms or support structures. You can't tie off to the same beam holding up your scaffold.
• Material: Lifelines can't be natural fiber rope. Synthetic only, and polypropylene must include UV inhibitors.
• Protection: Lifelines need to be protected from abrasion, cuts, and chemical exposure. A frayed line is a failed line.

Safety Nets as Fall Arrest Equipment

Safety nets don't get the attention harnesses do, but they solve a specific problem: protecting workers who can't realistically clip in and out repeatedly.

Under 1926.105, nets are required when workplaces are more than 25 feet above ground or water and other protection methods aren't practical. In structural steel erection, bridge work, and high-rise construction, a worker moving constantly across open framing might spend more time connecting and disconnecting a lanyard than actually working. Nets eliminate that friction. They're passive protection: fall, and the net catches you.

Installation specifications are non-negotiable:

• Extend at least 8 feet beyond the outermost edge of the work surface
• Install no more than 25 feet below the working level (as close as practical)
• Maintain enough clearance underneath to prevent contact with surfaces or structures below
• Test before use and don't begin operations until the net is in place

The net itself must also meet specific performance criteria:

One thing worth remembering: nets catch more than workers. Tools, debris, and materials can fall through or accumulate. Mesh openings and net condition affect what passes through and what stays. That's both a safety consideration (objects falling to workers below) and a maintenance issue (added weight and wear).

For most sites I've worked with, harness-based systems are the default. But nets remain the right answer when personal fall arrest equipment would create more problems than it solves.

Inspection, Maintenance, and Equipment Lifespan

Pre-Use Inspection Requirements

Working at height equipment doesn't fail randomly. It fails because damage went unnoticed.

Both 1910.140(c)(18) and 1926.502(d)(21) require the same thing: inspect personal fall protection systems before initial use during each work shift. Look for mildew, wear, damage, and deterioration. If something's wrong, remove it from service immediately.

Sounds simple, but in reality, it gets skipped all too often.

A NIOSH fatality investigation documented what happens when inspection fails. A cement finisher fell from a suspension scaffold at the 160-foot level. His lanyard caught him initially, but when his weight dropped back on the line, it snapped. Post-incident examination revealed burn damage at several points along the lanyard, including the failure point. The employer didn't control inspection or distribution of fall protection equipment. The lanyard had been returned to a common supply bin without anyone checking it.

When Should an Employer Inspect a Safety Net?

Safety nets follow a different inspection schedule than harness-based equipment. The standard isn't "before each use" but rather at least once a week, plus after any event that could compromise the system.

Per 1926.502(c)(5):

• Inspect weekly for wear, damage, and deterioration
• Inspect after any occurrence that could affect the net's integrity (an arrested fall, impact from debris, weather event)
• Remove defective nets or components from service immediately

There's also a housekeeping requirement that's easy to overlook. Materials, scrap, equipment, and tools that fall into the net must be removed as soon as possible, and no later than before the next work shift. That stuff adds weight, can damage the mesh, and creates hazards for anyone who falls into an already overloaded net.

What are you looking for?

• Holes, tears, or enlarged mesh openings
• UV degradation (brittleness, discoloration)
• Damage at connection points and border ropes
• Wear at contact points with structure
• Secure fastening to supports (forged steel hooks or shackles, not improvised hardware)

If drop testing isn't reasonable for a particular installation, 1926.502(c)(4)(ii) allows a competent person to certify compliance instead. That certification must be documented, identify the specific net and installation, include the date, and be signed. Keep it on-site.

When to Remove Equipment from Service

1910.140(c)(17) says any personal fall protection system or component subjected to impact loading must be removed immediately. It cannot be used again until a competent person inspects it and determines it's undamaged and safe. The construction standard at 1926.502(d)(19) says the same thing.

Most employers are a bit more cautious and retire the gear entirely even if it just arrested a fall. Stretching webbing, stressing stitching, and deforming hardware under the impact forces in a fall can be tricky to spot (and some gear now has hidden bright colored lining that becomes visible after an incident—that makes things a bit easier).

Remove from service when:

• Equipment has arrested a fall or been subjected to any impact loading
• Inspection reveals cuts, burns, abrasion, chemical damage, or UV degradation
• Hardware shows cracks, corrosion, distortion, or malfunctioning gates
• Stitching is broken, pulled, or inconsistent
• Labels are missing or illegible
• Manufacturer's recommended service life has expired

What about lifespan? Neither OSHA nor ANSI mandate a specific expiration date for harnesses or lanyards. They defer to manufacturers. Most manufacturers recommend a service life of 5 years from first use, though some tie it entirely to condition rather than age. Check your equipment's user manual.

The ANSI A10.32-2012 standard summarizes it well: remove equipment upon evidence of defects, damage, or deterioration; once subjected to impact loading; or upon expiration of the manufacturer's specified service life, whichever comes first.

My own take on it is this: when in doubt, retire it. A new harness is a small price to pay for your safety.

The Hidden Post-Fall Danger

A harness stops the fall. But the worker is still hanging in midair, and that's where a different danger begins.

Suspension trauma (sometimes called harness hang syndrome or orthostatic intolerance) occurs when a worker remains suspended in a harness after a fall. The straps dig into the femoral arteries and veins, cutting off the circulation to your legs. Blood pools in the lower half. Not enough blood gets back up to the heart. Before you know it, the person is feeling woozy, queasy, or disoriented. If rescue doesn't turn up fast, they'll start to lose consciousness.

According to OSHA's Safety and Health Information Bulletin on suspension trauma, suspension in a fall arrest equipment system can result in unconsciousness and death in less than 30 minutes. But that understates the urgency. Symptoms can begin in as little as 5 minutes. Some studies have documented subjects losing consciousness after just 6 minutes of motionless suspension.

This is why the OSHA fall protection standard requires more than just stopping the fall. Under 1926.502(d)(20) for construction and 1910.140(c)(21) for general industry, employers must provide for prompt rescue of each employee in the event of a fall. "Prompt" isn't defined in the regulation, but given what we know about suspension trauma, most safety professionals interpret it as single-digit minutes.

The data suggests just how important preparation is. A CPWR Fall Experience Survey found that workers who received self-rescue training had 76% lower odds of a fall being fatal compared to those without such training.

Your rescue plan should include:

• Suspension trauma straps or relief steps integrated into harnesses, allowing suspended workers to stand and restore circulation while awaiting rescue
• Training for workers on pumping or flexing their legs if self-rescue equipment isn't available
• Designated rescue personnel and pre-positioned equipment (ladders, aerial lifts, descent devices)
• Site-specific procedures, because a plan that works on a 20-foot scaffold won't work on a 200-foot tower
• Regular drills so the response is automatic, not improvised

One more thing I believe is worth noting: for years, the standard guidance was to keep rescued workers in a semi-reclined position (semi-Fowler's, at 30–40 degrees) before gradually moving them flat, based on concerns that pooled blood returning suddenly to the heart could cause cardiac issues. However, a 2023 review by the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine found no evidence that immediate supine positioning increases risk. Current recommendations favor standard trauma resuscitation with the worker placed flat. Given this evolving guidance, make sure your rescue training reflects current protocols and consult with medical professionals when developing your plan.

How to Choose the Right Fall Protection Equipment for Your Worksite

Assess Your Fall Hazards

This is the part many teams rush, even though it quietly decides whether the rest of the plan works or falls apart. Equipment selection feels concrete. Hazard assessment feels abstract. But every bad pairing I’ve seen between a worker and fall protection equipment traces back to someone skipping this step or treating it like paperwork.

This is my advice: stop and ask a few questions about the work itself.

What is the worker actually doing up there, minute by minute? Are they moving forward along a leading edge, leaning backward while setting forms, stepping over penetrations, climbing in and out of lifts, or standing mostly still while tying rebar? The motion matters more than the height alone.

Height still matters, of course. OSHA draws clear lines under fall protection requirements. General industry triggers at four feet while construction work triggers at six feet. But height is just the starting point. Clearance below the working surface often causes more trouble.

Here’s what I personally walk through, every time, before recommending anything:

• What’s the fall distance available below the working surface?
• What's the surface looking like below, anyway? is it concrete, rebar, machinery, or water?
• What kind of movement are we talking about here? Stationary, just a little bit of movement, or constant horizontal movement?
• What about edge conditions? Sharp steel, unfinished decking, roof edges, or concrete forms?
• Are there any obstructions in the fall path?
• And last one: is a rescue even feasible if a fall does happen?

That last one often gets quiet nods and no follow-up. It shouldn’t. A harness without a realistic rescue plan turns into a time bomb. I’ve pushed back on engineers about this more than once. They’ll say rescue is outside the scope of equipment selection. Technically, maybe. Practically, no.

Match Equipment to the Task

Start with how the work moves.

If a worker is mostly just standing in one spot and there's plenty of clearance below, a shock-absorbing lanyard might be okay. It's a familiar choice, easy to supervise, and it does what it's meant to do when the fall path has got some give.

The moment movement picks up, or clearance shrinks, SRLs tend to fit better. They lock sooner, and that shorter fall distance matters when the space below is unforgiving. On sites where workers are walking a deck, climbing, or shifting positions all day, lanyards can start feeling like the wrong tool even when they’re “allowed.”

Then I run a quick second filter that people forget.

Edges.

If the line can load across an exposed edge during a fall, the device choice changes. OSHA’s March 2024 hazard alert describes a fatal incident where a lanyard was severed after contacting an exposed edge, and it points to sharp-edge rated gear and edge protection as part of the employer’s hazard evaluation.

After movement, clearance, and edges, the last selection question is what the equipment is supposed to do for the worker:

• Positioning supports a worker in place so they can work hands-free. It assumes the worker stays supported.
• Restraint keeps the worker from reaching the hazard in the first place. It only works if the boundary stays true as the task changes.
• Fall arrest assumes the fall can happen and is built to stop it.

If the job is really “support,” but the site hands out “catch,” workers end up leaning on gear the wrong way. If the job needs “catch,” but the crew treats it like “support,” the failure is faster and uglier.

And then there's the problem of personal gear that actually makes the job more hazardous than it needs to be. When continuous tie-off is impractical, or when it tangles movement to the point crews start improvising, safety nets can be the cleaner option. Nets don’t depend on worker action at the moment of the fall, and they can cover broad areas where people are moving constantly.

Key Specifications to Look For

This is where selection usually drifts off course. The details start to feel abstract, and teams default to whatever meets the line item. The problem is that those details are not neutral. Each one quietly limits how, where, and whether the equipment will actually work on your site.

A better way to approach this part of the process would be to think about those details as filters.

1. ANSI Z359 compliance

Before getting lost in model numbers, it helps to check whether the manufacturer clearly states the gear meets ANSI Z359 requirements for that type of equipment. I look for the actual Z359 reference on the label or in the manual and not just “meets ANSI,” which can mean anything.

2. Compatibility comes first

Every piece of fall protection equipment has to connect cleanly to the next. Snaphooks, D-rings, carabiners, anchor connectors. If any connection can side-load, roll out, or sit at an odd angle under load, that is already a warning sign.

The thing is, all these compatibility issues usually get missed until it's too late or until the gear actually fails under load. And when it does, the forces can get pretty extreme, and connectors can start rotating in ways nobody planned for. If two bits of gear aren't explicitly designed to work together, it's a safe bet they won't.

3. Anchorage strength and orientation

Anchors may give a weight rating that looks fine, but orientation can be just as important. What looks solid at first glance can behave very differently when you put a load on it during a fall.

When evaluating fall protection anchor points, it helps to ask two practical questions:

1. Was this point intended to take load in this direction?
2. Does the setup keep the load predictable during a fall?

4. Capacity is not just body weight

Capacity limits include the worker, clothing, tools, and anything else attached. This sounds obvious, but it gets overlooked constantly, especially in cold weather or trade work where tools stay on the body.

That is why I think it helps to anchor the conversation to a number instead of a guess. ANSI/ASSP Z359.11 sets the standard harness user capacity range at 130–310 lb (59–140 kg). And when manufacturers talk about “user weight” in their instructions, they’re frequently talking about combined weight.

If the gear barely covers the expected load, it leaves no room for real-world variation. That margin matters more than most people admit.

5. Fit is not just a comfort issue

Poor fit shows up as loose leg straps, floating chest straps, and dorsal rings that ride too high or too low. Beyond discomfort, poor fit changes how forces travel through the body during a fall. With OSHA’s updated PPE fit requirement now in effect for construction, fit can no longer be treated as a one-size compromise. Selection should assume multiple sizes are necessary.

6. Environmental exposure

This is where equipment ages quietly. UV exposure, heat, welding spatter, chemicals, moisture. Webbing stiffens. Stitching weakens. Hardware corrodes. Labels fade. None of it looks concerning until it matters. If the work environment is harsh, durability and material compatibility should weigh as heavily as any strength rating.

7. Labels and instructions

If labels are missing or unreadable, the equipment is already on borrowed time. Labels carry critical information about capacity, approvals, and service limits. Once that information is gone, the equipment becomes guesswork. Treat illegible labels the same as a failed inspection.

Training Requirements for Working at Height Equipment

You can buy the best fall protection equipment on the market, but it won't help if workers don't know how to use it. Training is required by OSHA, and the standards spell out exactly what that training must cover.

For Construction

Under 29 CFR 1926.503, employers must provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The training must be conducted by a competent person and cover:

• The nature of fall hazards in the work area
• Correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting different types of fall protection systems
• The use and operation of guardrails, personal fall arrest systems, safety nets, warning lines, safety monitoring systems, and controlled access zones
• Proper handling and storage of equipment and materials
• The role of employees in fall protection plans

For General Industry

29 CFR 1910.30 requires training before any employee is exposed to a fall hazard. The standard specifies that training must be conducted by a qualified person and cover the nature of fall hazards, procedures to minimize those hazards, and the correct procedures for installing, inspecting, operating, maintaining, and disassembling personal fall protection systems. This includes proper hook-up, anchoring, and tie-off techniques.

One key difference: the general industry standard explicitly requires that training be provided "in a manner that the employee understands." If you have workers whose first language isn't English, this matters.

Certification and Documentation

For construction, 1926.503(b) requires employers to verify training by preparing a written certification record containing the employee's name, the date(s) of training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the employer. The most recent certification must be maintained.

When Retraining Is Required

OSHA doesn't mandate annual refresher training, but both standards require retraining when:

• Changes in the workplace render previous training obsolete
• Changes in the types of fall protection systems or equipment make previous training inadequate
• An employee demonstrates inadequate knowledge or skill in using fall protection equipment

I recommend documenting retraining triggers in your safety program. If an inspector asks why you retrained someone, you want a clear answer.

The Competent and Qualified Person

Construction standards reference the "competent person," defined as someone capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards and authorized to take prompt corrective measures. This person conducts training, inspects equipment, and makes judgment calls on whether equipment stays in service.

General industry uses "qualified person" for training, someone who, by degree, certification, or extensive knowledge and experience, has demonstrated the ability to solve problems relating to the subject matter. The standard is slightly different, but the practical expectation is similar: the trainer must have the knowledge to deliver effective instruction.

But Why Do Training Failures Persist?

I think the disconnect happens somewhere between "trained" and "trained effectively."

A 2022 CPWR survey of nearly 500 people who either experienced, witnessed, or investigated a fall incident revealed something telling: workers who believed fall protection was required by their employer were eight times more likely to use it than those who thought it was optional.

Jessica Bunting, director of the Research to Practice initiative at CPWR, told researchers:

"What we hear a lot from contractors is: 'Well, we provide the fall protection and then I come to the jobsite and it's still on the truck. The workers aren't using it. They have a brand-new harness and it's on the ground while they're on the roof.’ While this may be true on the surface, our survey findings showed that if you enforce that employees need to wear the fall protection, then they’ll do it. Just giving it to them isn’t enough. They have to be trained on its use. They have to know that it’s required by their employer, and there’s that expectation from their leadership.”

That tells us there's something deeper going on than just a ticking the boxes on a training checklist. It's about having policies and practices that actually line up.

In the same Safety+Health article, Doug Trout, deputy director of the NIOSH Office of Construction Safety and Health, frames the question employers should be asking: Do workers' perceptions of what the company says or writes about safety and health align with what's practiced?

"That's something employers can be working on regularly to decrease falls and improve all safety and health issues on the job," Trout said.

The OSHA case files show what happens when that alignment doesn't exist.

An Appleton, Wisconsin roofing contractor was cited repeatedly for allowing roof work without fall protection equipment or training. Inspectors found workers on roofs exceeding 6 feet with no protection. The contractor had been cited in October 2022 for similar violations and still faced $281,485 in proposed penalties for failing to "provide fall protection equipment or train employees how to use it."

Another Appleton case from March 2023: a subcontractor exposed nine workers to fall hazards just two months after the general contractor discussed safe work practices with OSHA. The subcontractor had been cited for failing to train workers on fall protection equipment in 2018 and again in 2020.

Training programs exist at these companies. What doesn't exist is follow-through.

Why Building a Safety Culture Is the Answer

Training requirements and enforcement matter. But the companies that actually see a significant drop in falls are the ones that build systems where fall protection becomes second nature.

NSC CEO Lorraine M. Martin framed it directly at the 2025 NSC Safety Congress & Expo:

"Employers, safety professionals and communities must intensify efforts through robust training, regular hazard assessments and leadership accountability to protect workers and save lives."

Two words stand out: leadership accountability.

When supervisors just walk past workers who arent tied off and say nothing, the message is loud and clear. When project schedules are so tight that they barely leave time for proper anchor installation, the message is plain as day. And when the competent person role exists on paper but nobody on site actually knows who it is, the message is unmistakable. The point is this: workers pick up on those signals a heck of a lot faster than any training manual ever could.

Building a safety culture that actually works requires visible, consistent action:

• Make expectations non-negotiable: Every worker knows fall protection is required at trigger heights. But do they know it's enforced? That's the key question. Supervisors need to stop work immediately when they see violations, every single time, without making exceptions for the schedule being tight.
• Use toolbox talks that address real conditions: Generic safety talks are a nice try, but they just check a box. But when you're having site-specific discussions about today's anchor points, today's clearance calculations, and today's edge hazards, you're actually preparing workers for the stuff they'll be facing in the next few hours.
• Designate and empower a competent person: OSHA's definition is pretty clear: that someone needs to be able to spot hazards and be allowed to stop work if things arent safe. And that second part is a big deal. A competent person who can't actually stop unsafe work isn't actually competent at all.
• Build peer accountability: When workers feel responsible for looking out for each other's safety, not just their own, that's when the culture starts to shift. A crew calling out unclipped harnesses isn't being a pain, theyre actually just doing things the way a good safety culture should.

I've seen sites where all the fall protection equipment was top-quality, the training records were complete, and workers still got hurt. The missing piece was always the same: leadership that treated safety as something to demonstrate, not just document.

FAQs

What is a common cause of falls from elevated stands?

The most common causes include lack of adequate planning, fall protection being provided but not used, and equipment being used improperly. According to a CPWR survey, nearly half of all reported falls involved no fall protection being used at all. Other contributing factors include slippery surfaces from ice or debris, improper scaffold construction, missing guardrails, and loss of balance while handling materials or tools at height.

What is the maximum height you can work at without using fall protection?

It depends on the industry. In construction, fall protection is required at 6 feet above a lower level under 29 CFR 1926.501. In general industry, the threshold is 4 feet per 29 CFR 1910.28. Scaffolds have their own rule at 10 feet. And regardless of height, protection is required whenever workers could fall onto dangerous machinery or equipment.

Under which circumstances must an employer provide a guardrail?

Employers must provide guardrails on any walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge 4 feet or more above a lower level in general industry, or 6 feet in construction. Guardrails are also required around floor holes, on stairway landings 4 feet or higher, along open-sided platforms, and on ramps and runways with unprotected edges. When workers could fall onto dangerous equipment regardless of height, guardrails or equivalent protection are mandatory per OSHA 1910.28.

Fall protection must be provided for scaffolds over how many feet?

Fall protection is required for scaffolds when employees are working more than 10 feet above a lower level, per 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1). This can be guardrails, a personal fall arrest system, or both depending on scaffold type. Employees on single-point and two-point suspension scaffolds must have both a guardrail system and a personal fall arrest system at any height.

What fall protection is required by OSHA when working on an aerial lift?

Under 29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v), employees working from an aerial lift must wear a body belt or full-body harness with a lanyard attached to the boom or basket. This applies at any height. However, body belts are only acceptable when using a restraint system that prevents the worker from reaching a fall hazard. If there's any possibility of an actual fall, a full-body harness is required. The lanyard should be short enough to keep the worker inside the basket.

How long is a fall protection harness good for?

There's no mandated expiration date from OSHA or ANSI. Service life depends on inspection results, manufacturer guidelines, usage frequency, and environmental exposure. Pre-use inspections are required before each shift, along with formal documented inspections at least every 6 months (ANSI A10.32 for construction) or annually (ANSI Z359 for general industry). These inspections determine when a harness should be retired.

TRADESAFE provides premium industrial safety equipment, such as Lockout Tagout Devices, Eyewash Stations, Absorbents, and more; precision-engineered and trusted by professionals to offer unmatched performance in ensuring workplace safety.