OSHA Hearing Protection Requirements: Guide for General Industry and Construction

Would you risk your hearing for a paycheck? For some workers across construction sites and factory floors, that's a daily reality.

More than 22 million workers in the United States face exposure to hazardous noise on the job every year, according to the CDC. For many, the sounds of jackhammers, grinders, turbines, and heavy machinery are part of the daily routine. What isn’t as obvious is the permanent damage those sounds can cause, often without warning and without pain.

On many job sites, hearing protection still takes a back seat to production schedules and short-term comfort. Workers remove earplugs to communicate. Employers skip noise measurements. New hires are handed equipment without explanation. The signs of damage show up years later during routine hearing checks.

That’s where protection matters most: not after the damage, but before. OSHA’s standards exist to push that responsibility upstream, before another worker loses something they can’t get back.

Key Takeaways

• OSHA requires hearing protection when workplace noise exceeds 90 dBA over an 8-hour shift, and mandates a hearing conservation program at 85 dBA in general industry under 29 CFR 1910.95.
• Hearing damage can be cumulative or immediate; once inner ear hair cells are destroyed by excessive noise, the resulting hearing loss is permanent and irreversible.
• NIOSH recommends stricter limits than OSHA, with a maximum of 85 dBA over 8 hours and halving exposure time for every 3 dB increase, highlighting the importance of both duration and intensity.
• Effective hearing protection depends on correct fit, compatibility with other PPE, and user training; poor selection or misuse can render even high-rated devices ineffective in the field.

OSHA Hearing Protection Standards

Federal rules exist to limit how much noise a worker can be exposed to and for how long. These standards fall under OSHA hearing protection requirements for both general industry and construction, and they define when action must be taken to prevent permanent damage.

29 CFR 1910.95: General Industry

The general industry standard represents OSHA's comprehensive approach to workplace hearing conservation. This regulation establishes two key thresholds that trigger different levels of employer action:

1. Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL): 90 dBA averaged over an 8-hour workday
2. Action Level: 85 dBA as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA)

What makes this standard unique is its multi-layered approach. Rather than simply requiring PPE at a certain noise level, it creates a framework that includes monitoring, testing, training, and recordkeeping components. The lower action level of 85 dBA recognizes that prolonged exposure below the PEL can still cause hearing damage over a working lifetime.

29 CFR 1926.52 and 1926.101: Construction

The construction standards take a different approach, focusing on direct protection rather than comprehensive programs. These regulations establish a 90 dBA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for an 8-hour workday, with exposure limits decreasing as noise levels increase.

29 CFR 1926.52 requires:

• Protection when sound levels exceed Table D-2 limits
• Use of feasible engineering or administrative controls first
• Implementation of a "continuing, effective hearing conservation program" when sound levels exceed permissible limits

29 CFR 1926.101 requires employers to:

• Provide hearing protection PPE when it's not feasible to reduce noise exposure below Table D-2 limits
• Ensure ear protection devices are individually fitted by competent persons
• Prohibit the use of plain cotton as hearing protection

While simpler in structure than the general industry standard, the construction regulations still place responsibility on employers to identify noise hazards, implement controls where feasible, and protect workers accordingly when engineering controls are insufficient.

How Does Hazardous Noise Result in Hearing Loss?

Noise-induced hearing loss occurs when sound waves damage the delicate structures inside the inner ear. The cochlea contains thousands of tiny hair cells that convert sound vibrations into electrical signals for the brain. Excessive noise exposure can permanently damage or destroy these hair cells.

The damage process varies based on exposure type:

• Cumulative damage develops gradually from repeated exposure to moderately loud noise over months or years. Workers may not notice the slow deterioration until significant hearing loss has already occurred.
• Immediate damage can result from extremely loud impulse sounds, such as explosions or gunfire, which can rupture the eardrum or cause instant, severe damage to inner ear structures.

Once damaged, these hair cells cannot regenerate, making noise-induced hearing loss permanent and irreversible. Beyond hearing loss, workers may experience tinnitus (ringing in the ears), difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments, and increased risk of workplace accidents due to impaired communication.

I reviewed a NIOSH evaluation of a hammer forge facility where employees were exposed to some of the highest workplace noise levels recorded (up to 155 decibels during hammer strikes). Investigators analyzed over 1,500 audiograms spanning more than three decades and found that hearing loss was widespread among the workforce.

More than 80% of workers experienced a measurable decline in hearing over time, and over 60% of those interviewed reported personal hearing loss. For many, it developed slowly over the years on the job. The loss wasn’t immediately obvious, but by the time it showed up on hearing tests or in daily conversations, it was already permanent.

What Decibel Level Is Harmful?

Scientific research has established that exposure to 85 dBA over an 8-hour period carries an 8% risk of developing hearing loss after 40 years of exposure, according to NIOSH's risk assessment models. Research published in peer-reviewed journals confirms that at 85 dBA there is a marginal risk with susceptible individuals, while at 90 dBA and above, the risk becomes material for the majority of workers.

OSHA considers 90 dBA over 8 hours as the regulatory limit, while the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends a more protective 85 dBA limit. This difference reflects OSHA's balance between worker protection and economic feasibility, while NIOSH focuses purely on health outcomes.

The way noise damages hearing depends on more than just volume. A sudden blast from a nail gun affects the ear differently than eight hours of steady machinery noise, which is why workplace safety requires examining various noise patterns:

From what I understand, the human ear perceives sound logarithmically, meaning a 10 dBA increase represents a tenfold increase in sound intensity. A jackhammer at 100 dBA delivers ten times more sound energy than a lawn mower at 90 dBA.

What Is a Safe Decibel Level?

Noise levels below 70 dBA are typically safe for any duration. Once exposure exceeds that, risk begins to increase based on how long and how often the sound persists.

The previously noted limits from NIOSH and OSHA serve as a baseline, but real-world safety depends on the combination of intensity and duration. Even within those limits, shorter bursts of higher-level noise can become unsafe faster than expected.

The following table shows how quickly allowable exposure time drops as decibel levels increase:

These values are based on NIOSH’s 3-dB exchange rate, where every 3-decibel increase halves the safe exposure time. When noise levels exceed these durations, reducing exposure becomes necessary through scheduling changes, equipment adjustments, or the use of hearing protection PPE.

Noise Level Chart

Noise levels on job sites vary widely depending on the task, equipment, and work environment. Without measurement, it’s difficult to know whether a noise source poses a long-term risk. So, I pulled together the following list using NIOSH and OSHA data, along with real-world measurements from industrial settings, to give a practical reference for how loud common sounds can be.

• 30–40 dBA: Quiet office, soft conversation
• 50–60 dBA: Normal conversation, light machinery at a distance
• 70–80 dBA: Vacuum cleaners, busy traffic, warehouse activity
• 85 dBA: Threshold where damage may begin with prolonged exposure
• 90–100 dBA: Forklifts, shop tools, sanding equipment, loud production floors
• 105–110 dBA: Power saws, grinders, snow blowers, leaf blowers
• 115–120 dBA: Chainsaws, pneumatic hammers, shearing presses
• 130 dBA and above: Explosions, gunfire, industrial forging

This range shows how quickly everyday equipment can cross into harmful territory. Many of these noise levels exceed the OSHA hearing protection requirements, especially in enclosed or reverberant spaces.

Using a calibrated sound level meter is the only reliable way to determine actual exposure. Employers responsible for environments where these levels are possible must identify risks early and take action based on measured data and not estimates.

When Is Hearing Protection Required?

A press operator works eight hours near a mechanical brake in a small fabrication shop. There’s no obvious alarm, no major complaint about the sound. But when noise monitoring is finally done, the exposure averages 91 dBA across the shift.

That’s all it takes.

Once exposure crosses the threshold, OSHA hearing protection requirements apply. For general industry, 90 dBA TWA means hearing protection must be provided and used. If the exposure is 85 dBA or higher, the employer must go further. Training, audiometric testing, and full program compliance are required under the OSHA hearing conservation program. In construction, the 90 dBA limit still mandates protection, even though no formal program is enforced.

In situations like that, I wouldn’t rely on a rough estimate. If the reading confirms the exposure, then the responsibility is already in place. OSHA doesn’t wait for a worker to notice discomfort. It expects action based on data.

When Is Double Hearing Protection Required?

Double hearing protection combines both the earplugs and earmuffs, as shown in the image above, to provide maximum noise reduction for extremely loud environments. While OSHA doesn't explicitly mandate double protection at any specific decibel level, industry best practices and NIOSH recommendations suggest its use above 100 dBA.

The noise reduction rating (NRR) of combined protection doesn't simply add the two NRR values together. The formula for estimating combined protection:

Higher NRR + 5 dB = Estimated combined protection

For example, earplugs rated at NRR 30 combined with earmuffs rated at NRR 25 would provide approximately 35 dB of protection, not 55 dB.

Situations warranting double protection:

• Impact or impulse noise above 140 dB peak
• Continuous noise above 105 dBA in certain industries (such as mining operations under MSHA)
• Workers with existing hearing loss in high-noise areas
• Environments where engineering controls cannot reduce noise sufficiently

Real-world attenuation typically falls below laboratory NRR values due to improper fit, wear time, and individual variability. For compliance with OSHA standards, NRR is adjusted by subtracting 7 dB from the labeled rating when using A-weighted measurements. NIOSH recommends applying an additional 50% safety factor after that adjustment for more realistic field estimates. This approach is especially relevant when evaluating whether existing protection is adequate or when engineering controls are being considered.

OSHA Hearing Conservation Program (General Industry Only)

When full-shift noise exposure reaches 85 dBA TWA, general industry employers are required to implement a hearing conservation program. This requirement falls under OSHA hearing protection requirements and applies even if the exposure stays below the 90 dBA level where hearing protection use becomes mandatory. The goal is to identify risk early, track it over time, and prevent irreversible damage before it occurs.

The OSHA hearing conservation program is built around five required components:

1. Noise Monitoring

Employers must measure workplace noise levels using valid sampling methods. This includes identifying which workers are exposed and under what conditions. The data must be updated as tasks, equipment, or processes change.

2. Audiometric Testing

Each affected worker must receive a baseline hearing test within 6 months of first exposure at or above the action level, followed by annual testing. These tests track changes over time and are used to detect standard threshold shifts. The program must include a method for evaluating those changes and determining whether follow-up is needed.

3. Training and Education

Employees exposed at or above the action level must receive OSHA hearing protection training at least once per year. The training must include the effects of noise on hearing, the purpose and proper use of hearing protectors (including advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types), and the purpose of audiometric testing.

4. Recordkeeping

Employers are required to maintain noise exposure measurement records for at least two years and audiometric test records for the duration of the affected employee's employment. These records must be kept current and made available to employees, former employees, their representatives, and OSHA officials upon request.

5. Availability of Hearing Protection

At no cost to employees, a variety of suitable hearing protectors must be provided. Workers must be given a choice among suitable options and trained on how to use them correctly. The employer must ensure proper initial fitting and supervise the correct use of all hearing protectors.

Programs that skip steps or treat these as checkboxes fall out of compliance quickly. OSHA expects each element to function as part of an ongoing system and not a one-time setup.

Types of Hearing Protection Devices

Not all hearing protectors are built for the same conditions. The choice depends on the task, the environment, and how the device fits into the rest of the worker’s gear. The most common types of hearing protection include the following:

Earplugs

These are inserted directly into the ear canal and come in several forms:

• Disposable: Made of foam and designed for single use. Widely used due to low cost and simplicity.
• Reusable: Often made from silicone or rubber, these can be cleaned and stored between uses.
• Custom-molded: Shaped to the worker’s ear by a professional for repeat use and improved fit.

Earmuffs

These cover the entire outer ear and are worn over the head or attached to a hard hat. Models include:

• Standard passive: Use foam-lined cups to block out sound.
• Electronic: Use built-in microphones to amplify ambient sounds while instantly compressing high-impact or impulse noise, making them ideal for intermittent exposures.

Canal Caps

Designed for tasks involving intermittent noise exposure. They rest at the entrance of the ear canal and are easier to remove and reinsert throughout the shift. While their lower attenuation makes them less suitable for continuous high-noise environments, this design feature makes them particularly effective for workers who move frequently between noisy and quiet areas.

What Should You Consider When Choosing the Type of Hearing Protection You Use?

A maintenance crew is scheduled to spend most of the day inside a turbine enclosure. The task involves air tools, grinders, and vacuum systems in a space that traps background noise. Several workers are wearing half-mask respirators. Others need face shields and hard hats.

Among the gear that needs to be selected before the shift starts, hearing protection has to match both the exposure level and the conditions the crew will actually work under. So the question becomes: which hearing protection will actually work under those conditions?

There’s no single answer that works for every setting. The right choice depends on how well the protection performs in the environment it’s assigned to.

Attenuation and NRR Adjustments

Noise Reduction Ratings (NRR) are based on controlled testing. Actual protection is usually lower unless fit testing is performed. OSHA adjusts NRR by subtracting 7 dB when comparing to A-weighted exposure levels. NIOSH recommends taking the adjusted value and dividing it by two to estimate field-level protection. A device rated NRR 30 will provide closer to 11.5 dB of reduction under that model. If the derated attenuation still doesn’t bring exposure below the required limit, a different approach, such as dual protection, may be needed.

Fit, Pressure, and Shift Conditions

Workers won’t wear protection that becomes uncomfortable or shifts out of place during the job. Earplugs that press or expand too forcefully may be removed mid-shift. Muffs worn under a hard hat may break seal when a worker tilts their head or adjusts their helmet. These are common problems that reduce actual use time and protection.

PPE Conflicts

Hearing protection PPE must work alongside whatever else the job requires. Some plugs interfere with respirator straps. Some earmuffs lift slightly when worn with helmets or welding visors. These mismatches cause incomplete sealing and make the labeled NRR meaningless. Compatibility has to be part of the selection process.

Noise Type and Duration

The way noise is delivered changes the kind of protection that works. Short bursts from impact tools carry a different risk profile than steady-state background noise. Long shifts in continuous exposure favor low-profile plugs. Tasks with variable noise or brief peaks may benefit from electronic muffs or quick-on/off options.

Training and Actual Use

A device only protects if it’s worn correctly. That includes full insertion, a tight seal, no damage to cushions or plugs, and knowing when to replace a device that’s no longer effective. OSHA hearing protection training exists to close the gap between what’s issued and what’s worn properly.

So, which hearing protection will actually work under those turbine room conditions?

For that kind of enclosed, high-reflection environment with overlapping PPE, I’d assign a high-NRR reusable plug, something that seals well without adding pressure. If measurements showed exposure at or near 100 dBA, I’d add a low-profile earmuff that fits over the plug without interfering with the helmet or respirator. Before the shift starts, I’d check seal interference with all PPE in place. And I’d walk each worker through proper fit (not just once but anytime gear or conditions change).

Employer and Employee Responsibilities

Employers have a legal obligation to identify hazardous noise conditions, implement control measures, and maintain program elements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.95. This includes providing hearing protection PPE, monitoring exposure, and ensuring compliance with all training and testing requirements. These responsibilities are not optional once exposure levels meet or exceed the relevant thresholds.

Employees, while not legally responsible for managing the program itself, are expected to use the protection provided, follow safe practices, and participate in required elements of the OSHA hearing conservation program. Without consistent cooperation at the worker level, even a well-designed program fails to prevent long-term damage.

OSHA Hearing Protection Training Requirements

Training is a required element of the OSHA hearing conservation program and must be provided to all general industry workers exposed to an average of 85 dBA TWA or higher. It is not a one-time obligation. OSHA mandates that training be delivered annually and that it be updated to reflect changes in equipment, processes, or policies that affect hearing protection.

The purpose of the training requirement is straightforward: workers must understand the risks of occupational noise, how protection works, and how to use it effectively. This applies whether the employer uses earplugs, earmuffs, or other forms of hearing protection PPE.

Training content must include:

• The effects of noise on hearing
• The purpose and function of hearing protection PPE
• Advantages and limitations of the types of hearing protection provided
• How to properly wear, fit, and care for the devices used
• The purpose of audiometric testing and how results are interpreted
• Workers’ roles and responsibilities within the program

The training must be easy to understand, conducted in a language the worker can comprehend, and documented. If a workforce includes multilingual personnel, the employer is required to deliver the training in each applicable language. Verbal, visual, or hands-on methods may be used as long as they effectively cover all required topics.

Employees must also have the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers during or after training. A presentation without feedback or interaction is not considered sufficient under OSHA hearing protection requirements.

Common Violations and How to Avoid Them

I read an OSHA case involving a Texas manufacturer cited in 2023 for a willful violation of hearing protection rules. Inspectors found that employees were exposed to hazardous noise levels, but no hearing conservation program had been established. 

There were no audiograms on record. No exposure measurements. No training. Hearing protection PPE was present, but the infrastructure that makes it effective (monitoring, documentation, follow-up) was missing entirely.

It’s not an unusual case. Many employers distribute protection, but don’t follow through on what’s required once exposure crosses the action level. OSHA enforces the full program and not just the visible gear. Below are five violations most frequently cited when hearing protection is present, but the program behind it is incomplete.

1. Noise was never measured, or measured under the wrong conditions

In many cited workplaces, employers assumed equipment noise would be under the limit or relied on outdated surveys. Readings were either never taken, taken during light operations, or not representative of full-shift exposure. OSHA requires actual data, not assumptions. The only way to avoid this is to measure noise where and when the work actually happens using calibrated instruments.

2. Audiometric testing was skipped or discontinued

Programs frequently start with a baseline test, then fall behind on annual follow-ups. OSHA expects these to continue year over year, not just at enrollment. Testing is the only way to detect early shifts. Maintaining a schedule and assigning someone to track testing dates avoids this failure entirely.

3. Training wasn’t documented or didn’t meet the requirement

Toolbox talks and short reminders don’t meet OSHA’s standard if there’s no record of who attended and what was covered. The regulation calls for training once a year, and that training has to include how to use, maintain, and select hearing protection. A printed outline with dates and signoffs is enough. The citation comes when there’s nothing to show.

4. Hearing protection didn’t match the exposure

Earplugs were handed out, but not selected based on actual conditions. Some were rated too low. Others didn’t fit with the rest of the PPE. OSHA doesn’t expect custom protection for every worker, but it does expect devices that reduce exposure to safe levels. That means checking the adjusted NRR and using the right device for the job.

5. Records weren’t available when inspectors asked

Even when programs exist, citations happen because the paperwork wasn’t ready. Exposure readings, audiograms, and training logs were missing, scattered, or created after the fact. OSHA expects these records to exist before the inspection. The easiest way to avoid this is to assign responsibility and keep documents together, organized by worker.

FAQs

What is the maximum level of noise that employees can be exposed to?

Under OSHA regulations for general industry (29 CFR 1910.95), the permissible exposure limit (PEL) is 90 decibels (dBA) as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA). For every 5 dB increase above that, the allowable exposure time is cut in half. Exposure above this limit requires hearing protection and may trigger additional program requirements.

Is 85 decibels safe?

Exposure to 85 dBA over an 8-hour shift is considered the action level under OSHA and the recommended exposure limit by NIOSH. Prolonged exposure at or above this level can lead to hearing loss over time. While it is below OSHA’s PEL, it still requires employers in general industry to implement a hearing conservation program.

At what PPE level are ear muffs required?

OSHA does not mandate a specific decibel level at which earmuffs must be used. However, if noise levels cannot be reduced below 90 dBA (PEL) through engineering or administrative controls, employers must provide hearing protection. Earmuffs are commonly selected for higher-exposure tasks or combined with earplugs when noise exceeds 100 dBA or when impulse noise exceeds 140 dB peak.

What is the ANSI standard for hearing protection?

The current ANSI standard referenced by OSHA for hearing protector ratings is ANSI S3.19-1974. This standard defines how the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) is determined in a laboratory setting. ANSI S12.6 is a newer standard that covers real-ear attenuation, but OSHA still references S3.19.

What is the rating system for hearing protection devices called?

The rating system is called the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR). It is expressed in decibels and indicates the level of sound attenuation a hearing protector can provide under laboratory conditions. OSHA uses NRR to evaluate whether a protector reduces noise to acceptable levels, with adjustment methods applied for real-world use.

TRADESAFE provides premium industrial safety equipment, such as Lockout Tagout Devices, Eyewash Stations, Absorbents, and more; precision-engineered and trusted by professionals to offer unmatched performance in ensuring workplace safety.