Eye and Face Protection at Work: How to Stay OSHA Compliant

Herbert Post
worker wearing safety goggles and face shield

A steel fragment slips past an eyelid. A splash of caustic chemical hits without warning. A split-second lapse and someone’s vision changes forever.

According to NIOSH, 2,000 workers suffer job-related eye injuries every single day that require medical attention. Behind these moments is a staggering financial burden: $300 million each year lost to worker’s compensation, medical bills, and lost productivity.

What makes these numbers more alarming is this: nearly all of it could be stopped. An estimated 90% of workplace eye injuries can be avoided with the correct eye protection PPE.

So why do they keep happening?

Often, it comes down to missed steps in compliance. OSHA uses a two-standard framework: 1910.133 outlines the rules for general industry, and 1926.102 covers construction work. Both are backed by 1926.95, which establishes general personal protective equipment criteria and fit requirements. Without alignment to the correct rule set, even well-meaning safety programs fall short.

 

Key Takeaways

  • OSHA divides its eye and face protection requirements between two main standards: 1910.133 for general industry and 1926.102 for construction, each with different hazard coverage and compliance duties.
  • A written hazard assessment is required to document risks and match them with appropriate eye protection; it must be updated whenever conditions or tasks change.
  • ANSI Z87.1 markings like Z87+, D3, D4, and W-shades help identify eyewear that meets standards for impact, chemical, dust, or radiation protection.
  • A face shield alone does not meet OSHA’s definition of eye protection; safety glasses or goggles must be worn underneath to satisfy compliance.
  • Most eye injuries and OSHA citations are preventable with proper PPE, training, and maintenance, yet failure to use primary eye protection remains the top citation issue.

 

What Is the OSHA Eye and Face Protection Standard?

OSHA 1910.133 - General Industry Requirements

OSHA 1910.133 addresses eye and face protection in manufacturing, warehousing, maintenance, and similar operations. Employers must identify the hazards, select equipment that meets an accepted consensus standard, and keep the program active through training and upkeep.

1. Written Hazard Assessment

Before protective equipment is issued, the employer must prepare a written certification that identifies: the workplace evaluated, the person certifying the evaluation was performed, the date(s) of the assessment, and identifies itself as a hazard assessment certification. The document must describe each hazard category and is updated whenever processes or conditions change.

2. Selecting Compliant Eyewear

Protectors chosen for impact or splash hazards must comply with the following ANSI standards:

  • ANSI Z87.1-1989 (R-1998)
  • ANSI Z87.1-2003
  • ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010
  • Equipment meeting newer standards (such as ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2020), if shown to be at least as effective

ANSI-compliant spectacles and goggles carry markings such as “Z87” or “Z87+,” which help employers confirm compliance, but OSHA accepts other consensus standards if they provide comparable protection. When impact hazards are present, supplying spectacles that meet these performance criteria satisfies OSHA safety glasses requirements and aligns the equipment with prevailing safety glasses standards.

3. Training, Maintenance, and Cost

After equipment is issued, the employer must:

  • Instruct workers on the use, care, and limitations of their eye protection PPE
  • Keep the gear clean, functional, and ready for use
  • Replace scratched, pitted, or damaged items without delay

Required OSHA safety glasses are purchased by the employer unless an employee voluntarily supplies a personal pair that meets the same protective criteria. Day-to-day attention to these duties keeps the program in line with 1910.133 and reduces the likelihood of citations.

OSHA 1926.102 - Construction Industry Requirements

Concrete cutting in the morning can shift to welding by afternoon, and wind can drive dust into every corner of the site. OSHA 1926.102 links each changing task to the correct eye and face protection and works with the broader PPE duty in 1926.95. Supervisors must revisit the written hazard assessment whenever crews, equipment, or weather alter exposure routes so that selected protectors still match the current risks.

Equipment Selection Highlights

  • Impact work: Spectacles that comply with any edition of ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 listed in the regulation, or a later version proved equally protective, satisfy OSHA safety glasses requirements for flying-fragment tasks and align with prevailing safety glasses standards.
  • Splash or heavy-dust work: Goggles provide the primary seal. A face shield may be added, but it never replaces the goggles.
  • Radiant-energy work: Table E-1 supplies welding shade numbers, while Table E-2 guides the choice of laser goggles.

Maintaining Alignment with 1926.102

Whenever subcontractors mobilize, equipment changes, or wind increases airborne debris, the superintendent must update the written assessment and confirm that each worker’s eye protection PPE still matches the revised hazards. Keeping the document dated and specific demonstrates compliance with OSHA 1926.102 from groundbreaking through close-out.

How 1926.102 Differs from 1910.133

Topic

1910.133 (General Industry)

1926.102 (Construction)

Side-shield rule for spectacles

Required when there is a hazard from flying objects; detachable side protectors are acceptable

Required when there is a hazard from flying objects; detachable side protectors are acceptable

Welding filter guidance

Minimum shade numbers listed in Table 1910.133(a)(5)

Minimum shade numbers listed in Table E-1 within 1926.102(c)(1)

Laser optical-density table

No laser-specific table in 1910.133

Selection table included in 1926.102(c)(2)(i) for wavelength-rated goggles

Work setting

Mostly fixed stations with stable hazard conditions

Tasks, crews, and exposures relocate; hazard review repeated when conditions change

Critical Distinction: Face Shields vs. Eye Protection

I’m often asked whether a face shield alone counts as compliance. OSHA’s citation record answers that question: In 2023, the agency issued 2,074 violations related to eye and face protection, and 2,034 of them involved workers who lacked the correct primary protector when a hazard existed. In other words, most infractions trace back to treating a face shield as a substitute for safety glasses or goggles.

Why “face shield only” leads to citations

A shield sits several centimeters from the face and is open at the chin and sides. Fine chips, splash droplets, or grinding sparks can arc through those gaps and strike unprotected eyes. When inspectors observe a hazard analysis that lists flying fragments, splash, or dust and then see workers with shields but no safety glasses or goggles, they write a citation for missing primary eye protection PPE.

The practical differences between primary eye protectors and face shields are summarized below.

Aspect

Safety glasses / goggles (primary protection)

Face shield (secondary protection)

Compliance point

Hazard blocked

Direct impact, small fragments, splash, dust

Larger impact, hot splash, radiant heat across full face

A shield never substitutes for the sealed coverage of primary eyewear

Coverage zone

Close to the orbital area; side coverage required when flying objects are present

Full-face frontage; openings remain at chin and sides

Both devices may be required together when hazards reach eyes and face

ANSI reference

Z87.1 spectacles or goggles marked Z87/Z87+

Z87.1 face protector marked with shield symbol

Marking confirms device type, not its role in the hierarchy

OSHA language

Eye protection must include side coverage when flying objects pose a risk (1910.133, 1926.102)

Face protection added “when a hazard requires” coverage beyond the eyes

Citations arrive when a shield is used without compliant eyewear beneath

ANSI Z87.1 Compliance and Equipment Standards

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 gives safety managers a practical way to confirm that spectacles, goggles, or face shields will withstand the specific hazards documented in a site’s hazard assessment. The standard ties each piece of protective eyewear to a set of laboratory tests and field-visible codes, so compliance can be checked without dismantling the product.

I rely on five quick checks to confirm an item is fit for issue:

  1. Locate the manufacturer’s mark. Every compliant lens or frame carries an ID code; if it has rubbed off, the device no longer passes an audit.
  2. Read the impact symbol. “Z87” signals basic-impact performance; “Z87+” adds high-velocity resistance, a common requirement under OSHA safety glasses requirements for grinding and nailing work.
  3. Look for task-specific codes.
    • D3 splash, D4 dust, D5 fine dust
    • U3–U6 ultraviolet; higher numbers block more UV for outdoor tasks
    • W plus shade number for welding filters
  4. Check temples and nose bridge for cracks or lens separation. Any play in these joints voids the original test results.
  5. Record the finding in the daily PPE log before the gear goes on a cart or into a worker’s hands.

In addition, I also request three documents for every model ordered and file them with the purchase record:

  • Third-party test report that matches the model code and lot number.
  • Letter stating which ANSI Z87.1 edition the device meets (1989, 2003, 2010, or later).
  • Statement that replacement lenses are original-manufacturer parts; aftermarket lenses void the certification.

Impact and Optical-Quality Benchmarks

Test

What happens

What it proves

High-mass drop

A 500 g weight hits the lens from 50 in.

Lens stays seated in the frame.

High-velocity ball

A 0.25-inch steel sphere strikes at 150 feet per second (approximately 102 mph); “+” mark is awarded when the lens survives.

Frame and lens resist shatter from fast-moving fragments.

Optical clarity trio

Refractive power, prism, and resolution are measured.

Clear vision, reduced eye strain over long shifts.

 

Understanding Your Workplace Eye Hazards

If I stand beside a cutting table, the first thing I notice is the spark path; at a mix station, the splash arc; and near a masonry saw, the cloud of fine dust that hangs at eye level. These quick snapshots show where eye and face protection must stop flying metal, seal against caustic liquids, or shield vision from grit and glare.

Turning those observations into a written record links each hazard to the correct eye protection PPE. A clear map of impact, chemical, dust, and radiation risks lets every crew member reach for the right protector and stay squarely inside OSHA eye and face protection requirements.

Who's Most at Risk?

If I had to predict which workers will show up in next year’s injury log, I would start with the crews that cut, grind, wrench, or weld all shift long. Injury records from the Bureau of Labor Statistics point straight at those roles, showing that a handful of occupation groups shoulder nearly all serious eye hits.

The survey that broke injuries out by occupation placed production; installation, maintenance, and repair; construction and extraction; service; and transportation/material-moving jobs at the top of the chart. Together, they accounted for 87% of all eye injuries involving days away from work.

workplace eye injuries by occupational group

The 2020 BLS review also counted 18,510 eye-related injury and illness cases that led to at least one lost workday in 2020—an incidence rate of 1.7 per 10,000 full-time workers. Most cases stemmed from contact with objects or equipment, a signal that flying fragments and particles still dominate the hazard landscape.

Across these groups, tasks with high-speed tools or pressurized fluids drive demand for snug eye protection PPE and impact-rated spectacles that meet OSHA safety glasses requirements. Selecting protection that matches job-specific hazards keeps crews inside OSHA eye and face protection rules and cuts down the lost-time cases reflected in these statistics.

The Four Categories of Eye and Face Hazards

eye hazards

Impact hazards arise wherever tools or machines launch fragments at speed. Chips from metal cutting, concrete chipping, or nail-gun work can strike the cornea before a blink is possible, leaving lacerations or embedding slivers that require surgical removal. Damage often happens in the first seconds of a task when workers are still positioning material, so reliable eye and face protection should be on before the first cut or strike.

Chemical hazards involve liquid splashes, atomized mists, and even vapors that condense on the eye surface. Acids, alkalis, solvents, and bloodborne fluids can burn tissue or carry infectious agents deep into the tear ducts. High-pressure lines and open tanks are typical sources, and the risk climbs when workers lean over hoses, pour concentrates, or mix two reactive products. For these jobs, sealed eye protection PPE and quick-reach rinse stations form the first layer of defense.

Dust and particle hazards develop where grinding wheels, masonry saws, or sandblasting rigs operate. Coarse grit abrades the cornea, while fine silica or wood dust lingers in the tear film and continues to scratch with every blink. Blowers and cross-drafts can lift settled debris back into the air, so exposure persists long after the tool is switched off. Abrasive particles also irritate contact lenses, which can trap debris against the eyeball.

Radiation hazards cover optical energy from welding arcs, plasma cutters, UV curing lamps, infrared heat sources, and lasers. Intense ultraviolet causes photokeratitis, a painful condition resembling sunburn on the cornea, while infrared and visible-light lasers can scar the retina within milliseconds. Optical radiation often affects bystanders as much as operators, because scattered energy reflects off metal, glass, and painted surfaces. Matching filter shade or optical-density rating to the source keeps these invisible threats below injury thresholds and satisfies OSHA classifications for radiation control.

Type of Eye and Face Protection for Each Hazard

When I assign protective gear for a task, I match the hazard to the marking on the lens or frame. The reference below shows those pairings at a glance.

Hazard category

Primary protection

When to add face-level coverage

Key marking or code

Impact

Impact-rated spectacles or goggles that meet OSHA safety glasses requirements

Face shield over glasses during grinding, chiseling, or rotary cutting

Z87+

Chemical

Splash-sealed goggles (liquid work, acids, bases, bloodborne fluids)

Chemical face shield over goggles for high-volume pours or pressurized lines

D3

Dust & particles

Indirect-vent goggles for chips and coarse debris; non-vent goggles for fine dust

Visor on a powered respirator when airborne load clouds vision

D4 (dust) or D5 (fine dust)

Radiation

Welding helmet with correct shade filter; laser goggles matched to wavelength

Keep impact spectacles underneath the helmet for continuous eye protection PPE

Welding filter shade from Table E-1 or laser optical-density code

 

When Should Safety Glasses Be Worn?

If I see flying fragments, chemical splashes, airborne dust, or arc flash listed in a hazard assessment, I don’t wait for a task to start. OSHA safety glasses go on the moment exposure exists. It doesn’t matter if someone’s running a tool, lining up material, or just walking through the zone. When the risk is there, eye protection PPE rated under current safety glasses standards is mandatory under both 1910.133 and 1926.102.

That obligation begins with the hazard assessment. Without a written document that links tasks to exposures and exposures to protection, no PPE program holds up. OSHA expects not just protective gear but proof that it was selected for a reason, by someone qualified, and reviewed when site conditions changed.

The steps below form the minimum expected process under OSHA for documenting hazards that require eye and face protection:

  1. Survey each work area: Identify tasks, tools, and work zones where workers may be exposed to flying fragments, liquids, airborne particles, or radiant energy.
  2. Group hazards by type: Assign each risk to one of four OSHA-recognized categories: impact, chemical, particulate, or radiation.
  3. Match protection to ANSI-marked equipment: Choose spectacles, goggles, or face shields that carry the corresponding Z87.1 marking for the hazard.
  4. Account for existing controls: Note whether guards, machine shields, or local exhaust systems reduce the hazard before PPE is applied.
  5. Certify the review in writing: The document must show the area evaluated, the date, and the name of the person who performed the assessment (1910.132(d)(2)).
  6. Train employees on selection and use: Record when instruction was provided, who attended, and what was covered, especially when PPE requirements vary by task.
  7. Reassess after changes: Revisit the hazard list when a tool, process, or contractor introduces new exposure pathways. Outdated assessments often lead to OSHA eye and face protection violations during inspections.

What Type of Eye Protection Should You Use When There Is Dust Present?

The right protection depends on how fine the particles are and how long they stay airborne. In most dusty environments, basic OSHA safety glasses aren’t enough. Goggles rated to current safety glasses standards are required to keep exposure out and ensure compliance in place.

Sealed vs. Vented Goggles

  • Indirect-vent (D4): Best for coarse debris that falls quickly, like sawdust, chaff, or packing fibers. Vents allow air circulation to reduce fogging.
  • Non-vented (D5): Required when dust floats or recirculates, such as silica, drywall powder, or fiberglass. A full seal keeps fine particles from bypassing the lens.

Particle Size and Protection Level

  • D4 handles larger chips and short-term exposure.
  • D5 provides a tighter seal for fine airborne material that lingers or becomes trapped behind lenses.

Anti-Fog Solutions That Work

  • Look for:
    • Anti-fog lens coatings (built-in, not wipes)
    • Dual-pane lenses that control temperature difference
    • Shrouded vents that slow fog without letting in particles
  • If a fogged goggle gets removed mid-task, it no longer protects, and can still trigger a citation.

Industry Examples Where Goggles Are Non-Negotiable

  • Construction: Concrete cutting, drywall sanding, joint-compound mixing
  • Mining: Crushing operations and ore transfer points
  • Agriculture: Feed mixing, grain transfers, and bin loading
  • Foundries: Refractory dust, fly ash, and airborne slag particles

 

Eye and Face Protection Safety Tips

I’ve seen how even well-equipped teams fall short when small details get missed. Scratched lenses don’t get replaced, side shields go missing, and workers reach for the wrong gear because the markings aren’t clear. These tips focus on the basic steps that keep protection in place and programs working day to day.

1. Program Implementation That Works

In one documented case, a facility reduced its eye injuries by 92% and cut lost work time by 98% after changing its eye protection policy, increasing supervision, and formalizing how training was delivered.

A working program includes instructions on proper fit, conditions that require upgrades from glasses to goggles or shields, and when equipment must be replaced. Safety glasses that are scratched, fogged, or loose are not considered protective. Regular maintenance, clear marking checks, and basic retraining keep the program active across shifts.

2. Learning from Industry Failures

When an industry has a pattern of preventable incidents, it shows where programs are breaking down. The automotive sector is one of the clearest examples. Repeated tasks like grinding and torch work happen near the face, yet many shops still skip basic protection and training.

“Many automotive mechanics are never taught the basics of safety. Eye injuries may be the most common mishap in the business... most mechanics rely on nothing more than their eyelids for protection” — George Swartz, former Midas safety director

When a trend like that shows up in one trade, it’s worth checking if the same habits exist elsewhere. Failing to train on markings, skipping fit checks, or treating shields as optional all show up repeatedly in citation records. Learning from these failures means tracking similar risks on your own site and fixing the gaps before the next injury shows up on your report.

3. Documentation and Training

OSHA doesn’t require a formal PPE policy on paper, but if an injury occurs and there’s no record of what was taught, when, or to whom, the program will be considered incomplete. Documentation gives the employer a defense and gives crews a point of reference when tasks or tools change.

Keep dated records for every safety glasses issue, damaged equipment swap, and refresher training. Job roles with different hazard exposures should be tracked separately to reflect the variation in required eye and face protection. Training sheets and inspection logs show the program is active and applied, not just written once and forgotten.

4. Preparing for OSHA Inspections

OSHA inspectors look for alignment. That means the protection being worn matches the hazards listed in the written assessment, the markings are legible, and the training records show employees were told when and how to use their equipment. Missing documentation, damaged lenses still in service, or workers wearing face shields without underlying eye protection all raise immediate red flags.

The most common gaps involve outdated assessments, eyewear with worn-off markings, and PPE issued without explanation of what the codes mean. A corrective strategy starts with checking field compliance before the inspector does: verify the match between task and gear, confirm that goggles or spectacles are stamped with current safety glasses standards, and make sure every employee can explain why they’re wearing what they’re wearing.

 

Eye and Face Protection FAQs

What is the minimum level of certified eye protection?

Protective eyewear must comply with ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 and be marked "Z87" for basic impact or "Z87+" for high-velocity impact. For most industrial tasks involving flying fragments, Z87+ is the minimum accepted under OSHA safety glasses requirements.

What is the minimum thickness of a safety lens?

ANSI Z87.1 does not set a fixed minimum thickness for all lenses. Instead, lenses must pass specific impact and optical tests. Most compliant non-prescription lenses are about 2 mm thick, but thickness alone does not guarantee protection. Performance testing determines compliance.

Which type of eye protection should be worn while working with chemicals?

Wear chemical splash goggles marked "D3" under ANSI Z87.1. These provide a sealed fit and are required for protection against liquids, vapors, or bloodborne fluids. Safety glasses alone do not provide the necessary coverage for chemical splashes.

Why are prescription glasses not adequate eye protection?

Regular prescription glasses lack impact resistance, side coverage, and ANSI Z87 markings. They do not meet OSHA's definition of protective eyewear and can shatter or allow hazards to bypass the lens.

What should people who wear prescription glasses do to protect their eyesight?

Use either ANSI Z87 compliant prescription safety glasses fitted by a qualified lab, or wear ANSI-rated over-the-glasses (OTG) safety glasses or goggles. In both cases, the equipment must meet safety glasses standards and match the hazard identified in the workplace assessment.

 

TRADESAFE provides premium industrial safety equipment, such as Lockout Tagout Devices, Eyewash Stations, Absorbents, and more; precision-engineered and trusted by professionals to offer unmatched performance in ensuring workplace safety.


The material provided in this article is for general information purposes only. It is not intended to replace professional/legal advice or substitute government regulations, industry standards, or other requirements specific to any business/activity. While we made sure to provide accurate and reliable information, we make no representation that the details or sources are up-to-date, complete or remain available. Readers should consult with an industrial safety expert, qualified professional, or attorney for any specific concerns and questions.

Herbert Post

Born in the Philadelphia area and raised in Houston by a family who was predominately employed in heavy manufacturing. Herb took a liking to factory processes and later safety compliance where he has spent the last 13 years facilitating best practices and teaching updated regulations. He is married with two children and a St Bernard named Jose. Herb is a self-described compliance geek. When he isn’t studying safety reports and regulatory interpretations he enjoys racquetball and watching his favorite football team, the Dallas Cowboys.

ENSURE SAFETY WITH PREMIUM SOLUTIONS