OSHA Inspection: Importance, Types, and Best Practices for Compliance

What makes one company a safety success story while another struggles to meet basic compliance? I have asked myself that question many times while working on workplace safety. Over the years, I have seen that the difference often lies in how well a company prepares for and responds to an OSHA inspection.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is at the center of workplace safety in the United States. Its inspections are designed to identify hazards, reduce safety violations, and prevent workplace accidents before they cause harm. Yet, I meet many business owners and managers who either misunderstand these visits or see them only as a threat. They often tell me they are unsure what will happen during an OSHA inspection or how to get ready without draining their time and resources.

So, in this article, I will explain the different types of OSHA inspections, why they matter, and how to build smarter safety strategies that go beyond trying to “pass” a visit. My goal is to help you see inspections as part of a larger safety framework, one that can strengthen your compliance efforts, reduce hazards, and protect your team every single day.

Key Takeaways

• OSHA inspections are initiated for specific reasons such as imminent danger, severe injuries, employee complaints, referrals, or targeted hazards in high-risk industries.
• A study found that inspections that result in penalties are far more effective at reducing injuries than inspections without penalties, especially when large fines address serious or repeated violations.
• Using a variety of inspection approaches, including high-hazard targeting, rotating site visits, and voluntary consultations, helps uncover more hazards and improve safety performance.
• Strong preparation, such as keeping records current, training inspection representatives, and correcting hazards promptly, can greatly reduce the likelihood and severity of violations.
• OSHA is increasingly using injury and compliance data to focus inspections where they are most likely to reduce hazards and prevent accidents.

What Is the OSHA Inspection?

According to OSHA 29 CFR 1960.2(k), an inspection is a “comprehensive survey of all or part of a workplace in order to detect safety and health hazards.” These visits are conducted by a compliance officer who has the authority to review operations, assess working conditions, and document any safety violations that could put workers at risk.

The scope of an inspection can extend to examining training records, evaluating equipment, taking environmental measurements, and interviewing employees. Depending on the circumstances, it may focus on a specific hazard or cover the entire worksite. The OSHA inspection process is carried out under federal authority and follows a standardized approach, and this structure is intended to maintain consistency in how onsite inspections are performed, regardless of the industry or location.

Why Does OSHA Inspection Matter?

Wayne B. Gray, John T. Croteau Endowed Chair in Economics at Clark University, who co-authored the study “Preventing Construction Deaths: The Role of Public Policies,” found that states with more frequent OSHA inspections and, in particular, voluntary consultation visits experienced lower fatality rates.

The same research showed that higher average penalties alone were not linked to lower fatality rates. However, inspections that resulted in OSHA citations did make a difference. As Gray explained:

“We’ve consistently found that an inspection which imposes a penalty tends to be followed by injury reductions, while inspections without penalties have no such impact. We interpret that as the penalty serving as a signal to the firm that something is wrong and needs to be fixed, particularly in the context of a multi-plant firm where the central office may be less aware of conditions in individual plants.”

The OSHA inspection process works as both a compliance mechanism and a means to improve safety. Inspections uncover hazards, address safety violations, and apply penalties when necessary, which can prevent workplace accidents and promote lasting hazard control.

That connection between enforcement and improved outcomes shows why inspections remain a critical driver of change. Gray’s study suggests that when a penalty is issued, it prompts a reassessment of work practices that can lower the risk of future workplace accidents. The presence of that consequence appears to turn an inspection from a one-time event into a catalyst for ongoing hazard control, which is exactly the outcome the OSHA inspection process is designed to achieve.

What Are the Types of OSHA Inspections?

I have seen OSHA inspections begin for many different reasons. Some are planned in advance, while others happen with no warning because of urgent safety concerns. OSHA classifies these as “programmed” or “unprogrammed” inspections. 

Programmed inspections are scheduled based on set criteria, such as targeting high-hazard industries or worksites with a record of safety violations. Unprogrammed inspections are launched in response to specific incidents or credible reports, such as a severe injury, a formal employee complaint, or a referral from another agency.

To understand the different types, it helps to first ask: what are the triggers for OSHA inspection? These triggers determine how the inspection begins and what the compliance officer focuses on once the onsite inspection starts.

Imminent Danger

Nothing moves an OSHA inspector into action faster than a condition that presents an imminent danger. OSHA defines this as a hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm before normal enforcement procedures would eliminate the risk. This is the highest inspection priority because it involves an immediate threat to worker safety.

When such a situation is found, the compliance officer will expect the employer to remove endangered employees from the hazard or correct the condition right away. If the hazard cannot be eliminated on the spot, OSHA can seek a court order to stop work until the danger is addressed.

Imminent danger inspections are not limited to one type of industry or job site. I have seen them occur during construction, manufacturing, and even in warehouse operations, anywhere the hazard is severe enough to require urgent intervention. Recognizing and fixing these hazards before they reach this point is an essential part of preventing workplace accidents and avoiding the most serious OSHA citations.

Fatalities or Severe Injuries and Illnesses

Employers are required to report all work-related fatalities within eight hours, and any inpatient hospitalizations, amputations, or loss of an eye within 24 hours. These reports frequently lead to an onsite inspection so a compliance officer can investigate the circumstances, determine if safety violations occurred, and decide whether OSHA citations are warranted.

During these inspections, the focus is on the events that caused the injury or death, the conditions at the time, and whether established safety and health standards were followed. The process often involves reviewing training records, interviewing employees, and examining equipment or work areas involved in the incident.

Complaints

Employee complaints are another common trigger for an OSHA inspection. When a worker believes there is a hazard or that the employer is not following OSHA rules, they have the right to file a complaint directly with the agency. These complaints can be submitted online, by mail, or by phone, and employees may request to remain anonymous.

If the complaint describes conditions that could lead to serious injury or illness, OSHA may send a compliance officer for an onsite inspection. In other cases, particularly for lower-priority hazards, OSHA may contact the employer by phone or fax to outline the concern and request a written response describing corrective actions. This is known as a phone/fax investigation.

Referrals

Referrals occur when information about a potential hazard comes from a source outside of the employee complaint process. These sources can include other government agencies, law enforcement, safety organizations, the media, or even concerned individuals who witness unsafe practices.

When OSHA receives a credible referral, it may initiate an onsite inspection to verify the conditions described. The seriousness of the hazard and the reliability of the source influence how quickly the inspection is scheduled.

I have seen referrals lead to the discovery of significant safety violations. In 2018, a photo of construction workers without proper fall protection circulated on social media and was subsequently reported to OSHA as a referral. This led to an inspection that resulted in citations and fines totaling over $29,000 against two companies. This demonstrates how external reports can uncover significant safety violations and lead to enforcement action, even when the workplace had not been part of OSHA's regular inspection schedule.

Targeted Inspections

Targeted inspections focus on specific industries, workplaces, or operations that present a higher risk of serious hazards. OSHA selects these sites based on objective criteria, such as high injury and illness rates, history of safety violations, or patterns identified through data analysis. These inspections can also be part of OSHA’s Special Emphasis Programs, which may be national or local and target hazards like fall protection failures, hazardous chemicals, or noise exposure.

Targeted inspections are not random as they are driven by evidence that the work being performed carries a heightened risk. For example, a roofing contractor with repeated cited violations for fall protection could be placed on a list for periodic checks. Once a compliance officer arrives for an onsite inspection, the scope will often center on the hazards identified in the targeting criteria, but other serious issues observed during the visit can still lead to OSHA citations.

Follow-up Inspections

Follow-up inspections are conducted to verify that hazards identified in a previous OSHA inspection have been corrected. These visits often occur after the deadline given in the original citation has passed, allowing the compliance officer to confirm that abatement measures were completed as required.

If the inspection shows that the hazard remains uncorrected, OSHA can issue a failure to abate citation. This can result in additional daily penalties until the issue is resolved, and in some cases, may escalate to more serious enforcement actions.

Follow-up inspections can be as detailed as the original visit, especially when dealing with cited violations involving high hazard conditions. They serve as a reminder that OSHA’s oversight does not end with the initial onsite inspection, as long-term compliance depends on ensuring that corrective actions are sustained and effective.

On-Site Consultation Program (Voluntary)

OSHA offers a voluntary consultation program for employers who want to improve safety in their workplace. According to Gray, “OSHA’s voluntary consultation program can be helpful for firms [that] are interested to learn about potential hazards without the penalties associated with enforcement inspections.”

This service is separate from enforcement and is provided at no cost. A consultant, often from a state agency, will:

• Conduct an onsite inspection of the facility
• Identify hazards that could result in OSHA citations during an enforcement visit
• Review safety programs, including safety audits
• Examine documents such as training records to check compliance
• Recommend corrective actions and follow up to ensure hazards are addressed

A consultation visit often uncovers unsafe or unhealthy conditions that might otherwise be missed until a serious incident occurs. Because there are no penalties involved, employers are more willing to discuss hazards openly and take corrective action.

What to Do During an OSHA Inspection Process

Under 29 CFR 1903.3, OSHA has the legal authority to enter and inspect a workplace to determine compliance with safety and health requirements. A compliance officer can review operations, inspect equipment, examine documents such as training records, and conduct private employee interviews. They may also take photographs, measurements, and samples if needed to evaluate potential hazards.

Knowing the steps is one thing, but knowing how to handle them in real time is what makes the difference. Below is the actual flow of an onsite inspection, along with the steps I recommend taking to stay in control and reduce the risk of OSHA citations.

1. Preparation Starts Before OSHA Arrives

A compliance officer will already have reviewed your inspection history, processes, and potential hazards.

• Keep training records, injury logs, and safety audits updated and accessible.
• Assign someone in advance to act as the employer representative during inspections.
• Make sure your PPE and hazard controls meet the standards for your industry.

What I’ve seen trip people up: scrambling to find documents or PPE while the officer is already at the gate. That sets the wrong tone immediately.

2. Presentation of Credentials

The inspection begins when the officer shows official credentials. Always verify these before proceeding. If you wish, you can request a warrant, but in my experience, this delays the process and rarely changes the outcome.

During the inspections I’ve been to, the smoothest ones start with a designated point person greeting the officer and confirming the scope right away. It avoids confusion and keeps the inspection on track from the start.

3. The Opening Conference

This is where the officer explains why your site was selected and what areas will be inspected.

• Listen carefully and take notes. This is your first clue about the inspection’s focus.
• Ask clarifying questions about the scope. Narrowing it now can prevent unnecessary expansion later.
• Have your chosen representative (and employee rep if applicable) present.

I use the opening conference to confirm how employee participation will be handled during the inspection. Knowing in advance whether the officer will speak to workers privately or during the walkaround helps me prepare the team and avoid surprises.

4. The Walkaround

The officer, accompanied by your representative(s), will examine work areas, equipment, and hazard controls.

• Address minor issues immediately if possible.
• Confirm required postings are in place, including the official OSHA poster.
• Be ready to provide requested training records and explain safety procedures clearly.

Since 29 CFR 1960.26 calls for more frequent inspections in high hazard areas, I know those spaces will get close attention. I’ve learned not to argue about a hazard during the walkaround. Fixing what I can on the spot leaves a much better impression than debating it in the field.

5. Closing Conference

After the walkaround, the officer will meet with you and employee reps to go over findings. This is your chance to:

• Ask questions about any alleged hazards.
• Discuss possible corrective actions.
• Clarify deadlines for abatement if citations are issued.

More than once, I’ve seen others leave this meeting without a clear grasp of deadlines or next steps. Before OSHA walks out, I make sure every requirement, date, and action item is written down and understood.

Phone/Fax Investigations

For lower-priority hazards, OSHA may handle the complaint remotely. They’ll contact you by phone, send details via fax, and expect a written response within five working days describing what was found and how it was fixed. This still goes on record, so treat it seriously.

What Happens After the Inspection? Results and Appeals

If violations are found:

• OSHA must issue any citation and proposed penalty within six months of the violation.
• Citations will include the requirement violated, the proposed penalty, and the abatement deadline.
• Violations can be classified as willful, serious, other-than-serious, de minimis, failure to abate, or repeated.

Appeals:

• You have 15 working days after receiving the citation to request an informal conference with OSHA or to file a formal contest.
• The goal should always be hazard correction, but if you believe a citation is inaccurate, use this window to challenge it.

When I’ve helped prepare teams for an inspection, the ones who kept calm, had their documents ready, and managed the scope from the opening conference almost always walked away with fewer or no cited violations. The difference is preparation and mindset.

If you approach an inspection as an opportunity to demonstrate your safety culture instead of treating it as a disruption, you control the tone from the start. The compliance officer will still document hazards, but they’ll also note your cooperation, responsiveness, and commitment to fixing problems. That can influence penalty reductions, abatement terms, and even how OSHA prioritizes your facility for follow-up inspections in the future.

Best Practices for OSHA Compliance

Compliance is a continual process that combines hazard prevention, accurate documentation, and a proactive approach to safety. The most effective strategies don’t just meet the letter of the law but make safety part of daily operations.

With that in mind, I’ll share the practices I’ve found most effective for reducing safety violations, avoiding repeat cited violations, and strengthening readiness during an OSHA inspection. These steps can help protect workers, lower the likelihood of workplace accidents, and improve results if a compliance officer does arrive for an onsite inspection.

1. Prioritize High-Hazard Areas

Put special focus on areas and tasks that carry the highest risk. OSHA applies the same principle in its own inspection priorities, and under 29 CFR 1960.26, federal agencies are required to inspect all workplaces frequently, giving particular attention to high-hazard areas and operations. Even though this regulation is written for federal worksites, the approach is just as effective in private industry.

To put this into practice, I start by identifying work areas or processes with the greatest potential for serious injury or illness. Common examples include:

• Elevated work without proper fall protection
• Machinery with inadequate guarding
• Confined spaces with poor ventilation
• Chemical handling or storage areas with incomplete hazard controls

Once these hazards are identified, I make them a standing priority in safety audits. This means checking them more often, reviewing procedures in detail, and confirming that employees in those areas have up-to-date training records for the tasks they perform.

2. Use Consultations Strategically

Voluntary consultation visits can be a powerful way to strengthen compliance before an enforcement inspection ever happens. Instead of treating them as a general safety review, I use them with a clear plan: targeting specific areas where hazards are more likely or where recent changes in equipment, processes, or staffing may have introduced new risks.

The most effective consultations I’ve been part of are those where the employer prepares in advance. This means having safety audits ready for review, organizing training records, and identifying problem areas you want the consultant to focus on. By doing this, the feedback becomes actionable rather than general.

I’ve seen others schedule consultations after facility upgrades, process changes, or a spike in near-miss incidents. In each case, using the consultant’s recommendations to address safety violations early helped avoid cited violations during later enforcement visits and reduced the chance of workplace accidents in the process.

3. Leverage Internal Data + OSHA Tools

Staying inspection-ready means using safety information continuously, not just when an OSHA inspection is coming. Internal records and OSHA-provided resources can work together to reveal risks and prevent workplace accidents before they happen.

Internal data to review regularly:

• Injury and illness logs
• Near-miss reports
• Findings from safety audits
• Equipment maintenance records

OSHA tools worth using:

• Injury Tracking Application
• OSHA eTools for interactive hazard and industry guidance
• Hazard recognition and control resources from OSHA’s Safety and Health Topics pages

When you combine these two sources, you can see patterns that point to potential safety violations and adjust training, procedures, and inspection priorities. This targeted approach keeps risk lower and makes it easier to respond confidently during an OSHA inspection.

Penalties, Misconceptions, and the Role of Enforcement

The Need for a Mixed Strategy

Relying on only one inspection approach can leave blind spots. Focusing only on high-hazard sites can overlook emerging risks in other locations, while spreading inspections too thin can miss persistent problems that need more follow-up. Gray captured this balance well:

“I think a mix of strategies is appropriate since there are a variety of reasons why firms might be out of compliance. […] Targeting inspections towards high-hazard workplaces makes sense but going back to the same workplace year after year may be less productive than spreading around some inspections to lower-hazard places that have never been inspected.”

A mixed strategy means planning inspections and reviews in a way that keeps every site on the radar without ignoring the places most likely to have serious hazards. I’ve seen this work best when companies:

• Rotate safety audits so that all facilities get attention within a set cycle
• Schedule follow-up inspections quickly when safety violations are found, instead of waiting until the next routine visit
• Use voluntary consultations for new equipment, processes, or expansions
• Keep training records and incident logs current across all sites, not just the high-hazard ones
• Track and compare incident trends in both high-hazard and lower-hazard areas to guide resources

This balanced approach prevents hazards from slipping through the cracks and reduces repeat-cited violations. More importantly, it builds a safety program that can adapt.

Rethinking the Power of Penalties

When penalties are discussed, many assume that higher fines automatically lead to safer worksites. The reality, as Gray’s research shows, is more nuanced. As he put it:

“My research has shown that within the usual range of penalties, getting a larger penalty doesn’t seem to have a significantly larger response in terms of reductions in injuries. However, this shouldn’t be interpreted as penalties being irrelevant. […] It’s not that penalties are not impactful, just that the difference between a $5,000 and a $10,000 penalty may not be very noticeable.”

In the construction fatality study Gray co-authored, the data showed that differences in average penalty amounts between states were too small to produce a clear effect on fatality rates. What mattered more was whether a penalty was issued at all, especially in the rare cases where very large penalties (over $40,000) were combined with press releases, which appeared to have a deterrent effect in surrounding worksites.

As Gray has also pointed out, “There is also evidence that really large penalties associated with a pattern of significant violations at the firm-level can have a significant impact on the firm's safety practices.”

In my own experience, the penalties that make a difference are those that prompt leadership to act beyond the cited hazard. The most effective responses include:

• Reviewing recent safety audits for related issues
• Updating training records where gaps contributed to the violation
• Scheduling follow-up inspections to confirm hazards remain corrected
• Documenting corrective actions to ensure they are sustained over time

Handled this way, penalties can still be a turning point: reducing safety violations, preventing workplace accidents, and lowering the risk of future cited violations.

Common Misunderstandings About OSHA

Gray pointed out a common misconception I’ve seen reflected in conversations with many employers:

“There seems to be a sense that OSHA standards have been focused primarily on technical details that are easy to identify but only peripherally related to making the workplace safer. That may come from the early years of OSHA when the agency was allowed to adopt large sets of existing injury standards, many of which were less connected to hazardousness (e.g., the height and placement of exit signs), but [it] is no longer true.”

That early history still shapes how some people think about OSHA today. The belief that inspections are all about minor, low-impact details can lead companies to prepare for a visit in the wrong way. They focus on quick cosmetic fixes or spotless paperwork, while hazards that can cause serious injuries remain unaddressed.

In reality, today’s OSHA inspections are built around hazards with the greatest potential for harm: fall protection, machine guarding, electrical safety, chemical handling, and other high-risk areas. Technical requirements are still part of the inspection process, but they are no longer the driving force. Missing this shift can leave an employer exposed to serious OSHA citations even if every document is in order.

Frequent misconceptions I also encounter include:

What’s Next: Trends and the Future of OSHA Inspections

OSHA’s inspection strategy is shifting, shaped by advances in data collection, evolving enforcement priorities, and lessons from past inspections. Future approaches are expected to be more selective, with resources concentrated where they can produce the greatest safety gains.

Gray noted the potential for inspections to be guided more by analytics:

“As OSHA accumulates more years of injury data through the Injury Tracking Application, they could work with researchers to try to discover patterns in the injury data that could identify where inspections would be most useful – which plants and firms are most likely to respond to the inspection in a way that would reduce injuries.”

This kind of data-driven targeting could mean:

• Prioritizing workplaces with a history of cited violations, repeat hazards in safety audits, or documented unsafe or unhealthy conditions.
• Identifying sectors or operations with higher probabilities of serious workplace accidents.
• Directing OSHA inspectors to sites where enforcement has the best chance of changing unsafe practices.

Alongside improved targeting, OSHA is expected to maintain pressure on repeat violators. As Gray observed, “…the penalties for repeat and willful violations are sizable, and a consistent pattern of ignoring OSHA enforcement seems to help most firms decide to fix the hazard [when] violations are cited.”

In practice, this may involve:

• Higher penalties for employers with repeat or willful offenses.
• Follow up inspections to confirm hazard correction within required deadlines.
• Increased likelihood of an onsite inspection for operations with unresolved safety violations.

Precise targeting, paired with strong enforcement against habitual offenders, allows OSHA to focus on the workplaces where its efforts are most likely to prevent serious hazards and reduce injury rates. For employers, this signals a future where both data history and compliance track record play a major role in determining inspection risk.

FAQs

OSHA can’t inspect every workplace, so what kinds of workplaces does OSHA target to do its job?

OSHA focuses its enforcement on higher-risk industries and sites with greater potential for workplace accidents. Priority is given to operations with known unsafe or unhealthy conditions, a history of cited violations, or industries covered under National or Local Emphasis Programs. Targeted inspections also occur when injury data or past safety audits indicate elevated hazard levels.

What type of OSHA inspection is conducted when immediate death or serious harm is likely?

An imminent danger inspection is initiated when an OSHA inspector determines there is a reasonable certainty that a hazard exists that could cause death or serious physical harm before it can be eliminated through normal procedures. These inspections are unannounced and take top priority.

What requires frequent safety and health inspections?

Employers have a general duty under the OSH Act to provide a safe workplace, which includes conducting regular safety evaluations. Employers should conduct frequent safety audits in high hazard areas or tasks with elevated risk to ensure hazards are identified and corrected promptly. While OSHA doesn't specify exact frequencies for employer self-inspections, regular monitoring helps maintain compliance with safety standards.

Can you refuse an OSHA inspection?

An employer may refuse entry, but the compliance officer can obtain an inspection warrant. Refusal usually delays rather than prevents an onsite inspection, and it may signal to OSHA that the workplace requires closer review.

Who is responsible for keeping your facility in compliance?

The employer holds ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with OSHA standards. This includes maintaining accurate training records, correcting safety violations, and making sure the OSHA inspection process is supported through cooperation and proper documentation.

TRADESAFE provides premium industrial safety equipment, such as Lockout Tagout Devices, Eyewash Stations, Absorbents, and more; precision-engineered and trusted by professionals to offer unmatched performance in ensuring workplace safety.