OSHA 2025 Regulatory Changes Highlights Inclusivity, Climate Adaptation, and Risk Management

Herbert Post
osha regulatory changes

Key Takeaways

  • OSHA 2025 introduces a cultural shift toward proactive, inclusive, and climate-conscious workplace safety.

  • Inclusivity is prioritized with accessible safety training and workplace design for workers of all abilities and backgrounds.

  • New standards require climate adaptation measures, including protections against extreme heat, wildfire smoke, and floods.

  • The Hazard Communication Standard is updated to improve labeling, training, and multilingual access to chemical safety data.

 

Workplace safety regulations aren’t simply obligations that large companies and organizations need to comply with. These regulations are present in the workforce for one reason alone: it is to protect each employee and guarantee their safety as they do their duty.

For 2025, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s changes in these work regulations redefine the workforce’s safety. The updates signal a cultural shift, emphasizing bias-free work gear, proper climate response, and proactive safety measures. For companies willing to lead, these rules present a chance to enhance morale, retention, and resilience, not just compliance.

 

The Three Big OSHA Updates in 2025

1. PPE Fit Requirements (Effective January 13, 2025)

What the Change Is

OSHA has revised its PPE standards for construction to specify that PPE must "properly fit" each affected employee. This replaces vague language that allowed employers to provide "appropriate" equipment without clear standards for fit, comfort, or functionality.

Why OSHA Prioritized This

  • Persistent Safety Gaps for Women and Diverse Workers: For decades, PPE has been predominantly designed for an average-sized male worker. Female construction workers and smaller-framed individuals have reported safety concerns due to oversized gloves, harnesses, vests, and goggles. 

  • Injury & Risk Correlation: Poorly fitting PPE increases the likelihood of accidents like gloves that slip, harnesses that chafe or fail, goggles that fog or leave gaps, which are all real hazards.

  • Pressure from Equity and Inclusion Advocates: Over the past 5–10 years, industry groups, unions, and safety researchers have increasingly called for more inclusive PPE standards, with strong advocacy from organizations like the American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP). These advocates emphasize that many existing PPE designs are based on outdated, male-centric sizing models. As a result, women and smaller-framed workers are often left with gear that compromises both comfort and safety.

Expert Insight:

“It’s important that you're wearing something that doesn't look like you should be wearing a red clown nose. For example, a woman who has to wear extra-large PPE where she has to roll up the pant legs and roll up the cuffs and tape them to make the gear that she needs to do her job safely fit her.”
Kathi Dobson, CSP, CHST, CIH, SMS, STSC, Safety Director for Alberici Constructors

Why Now?

  • Legal Vulnerability: Ambiguity in the original rule left room for legal and compliance challenges.

  • Increased Workforce Diversity: As more women and minority workers enter trades, one-size-fits-all gear is no longer acceptable or defensible.

  • Public and Congressional Pressure: Congressional hearings and media reports highlighting safety inequities prompted regulatory review.

Compliance Situation

Even though the regulation already went into effect last January 13, 2025, many companies are still using bulk-issued PPE that lacks size variation. And because there are cases that organizations are locked in procurement contracts annually or biannually, compliance is delayed within the rule’s effective date. 

Doug Parker, assistant secretary for occupational safety and health, emphasized the importance of proper fit, stating, “PPE must fit properly to work. I’m proud of the broad support from both employers and unions for OSHA’s efforts to make clear that employers must provide the right PPE for each worker who needs it.” His remarks highlight a growing consensus that one-size-fits-all approaches are no longer acceptable in ensuring worker safety. 

2. Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Standard (Proposed, not yet final)

What the Change Is

OSHA has also proposed a new standard that would compel employers to assess and manage heat risks, particularly in industries like agriculture, food service, and construction, as the image below. 

exposed construction worker

The proposal specifies mandated access to water, rest, and shade, heat hazard training, written heat safety plans, and emergency protocols for heat illness.

Why OSHA Prioritized This

  • Record-Breaking Temperatures: In recent years, heat waves have intensified. 2023 tied for the hottest year on record. With climate change worsening every year, extreme heat is now a systemic workplace risk.

  • Injury and Death Statistics: From 2011–2022, more than 400 worker deaths and thousands of hospitalizations were attributed to occupational heat exposure. Even with this, numbers are widely believed to be underreported.

  • Patchwork State Protections: Only a few states (like California, Washington, and Oregon) had any form of heat protection law. A federal standard is needed for consistency.

Why Now?

  • Executive Order (2021): President Biden directed OSHA to address heat stress as part of a broader climate resilience initiative.

  • Worker Advocacy and Whistleblowing: Warehouse and farm workers, especially in the South and Southwest, have increasingly spoken out, gaining media and public attention.

  • Political Window of Opportunity: OSHA fast-tracked the rule under the Biden administration, aware that future administrations may be less favorable to regulatory expansion.

Political Crosswinds: Why the Rule Is in Limbo

The proposed rule is still in development and may be finalized by late 2025. But its future is uncertain. Despite the urgency, political turnover, court challenges, and lobbying efforts could delay or dilute its implementation. There is also significant resistance, particularly from business advocacy groups and small businesses, raising concerns about feasibility, cost, and clarity.

  • Resource Constraints: Small business owners argue that the rule imposes administrative and logistical burdens they are ill-equipped to handle. For example, maintaining written plans, documenting rest breaks, or tracking real-time temperature indices may be easy for large corporations with full-time safety staff, but not for a 12-person roofing crew or a local warehouse.
  • One-Size-Fits-All Concerns: The U.S. Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy submitted official comments warning that OSHA’s approach may not properly account for the diversity of work environments. A landscaper in Oregon and a baker in Florida could be subjected to the same rules despite vastly different risks.
  • Economic Uncertainty: Some employers worry that compliance costs—such as investing in shade structures, hydration systems, or training time—could undercut profit margins in already competitive sectors like construction, food service, and agriculture.
  • Enforcement Clarity: Several industry associations have asked OSHA for clearer guidance on enforcement thresholds. How will inspectors evaluate subjective measures like “adequate rest” or “sufficient shade”? Small businesses fear that unclear standards will increase the risk of citations and fines.

3. Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) Update (Final Rule Expected in 2025)

What the Change Is

Another upcoming shift involves improving how chemical hazards are labeled and communicated. These changes aim to reduce injuries caused by inconsistent or unclear hazard information, which directly affects safety data sheets (SDS), classification of chemical hazards, and new categories for physical and health hazards.

Why OSHA Prioritized This

  • Outdated Framework: The current standard is based on older GHS versions (Rev 3). It does not fully reflect modern hazards or international best practices.

  • Inconsistent Chemical Information: Workers and emergency responders have faced confusion from inconsistent labels or incomplete SDS details across manufacturers and suppliers.

  • Global Trade Alignment: Multinational companies have struggled with differing chemical standards in the U.S., Europe, and Asia. Updating HCS supports an easier global alliance.

Why Now?

  • Industry Demand for Clarity: Although this is a rare OSHA change, many industries are actively supporting it since streamlined classification and better hazard communication reduce liability and improve training.

  • Rise in Chemical-Related Illnesses: With the growth in manufacturing, electronics, and pharma sectors, chemical exposure risks are increasing and more nuanced than before.

  • Technological Enablement: New digital SDS platforms and hazard tracking tools make compliance easier to implement and monitor.

Compliance Phase

OSHA published the final rule in the Federal Register on May 20, 2024. And while the rule was published last year, 2025 marks the pivotal implementation period, as manufacturers, importers, and employers begin adapting their labels, safety data sheets (SDSs), and training programs to meet new federal requirements.

The update aligns U.S. regulations with the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Revision 7, and introduces new hazard categories like desensitized explosives and chemicals under pressure, alongside clearer rules for small container labeling and trade secret disclosures. For safety professionals, this isn’t just a technical update but a structural shift in how chemical hazards are communicated and managed across the supply chain.

What Leading Companies and Organizations Are Doing Now

As OSHA rolls out its most consequential regulatory updates in over a decade, some of the world’s most influential employers are already taking action, not just to comply, but to lead.

Boeing: Safety Culture Through Transparency

In early 2024, Boeing reported a 500% increase in employee safety submissions via its “Speak Up” reporting tool compared to the previous year. The sharp rise followed a company-wide push for psychological safety and frontline visibility, driven in part by internal audits and public scrutiny. Boeing’s leadership framed the surge as a sign of trust, not trouble: workers were more empowered to flag PPE issues, unsafe environments, and procedural gaps.

Siemens: Proactive Risk Management at Scale

Global manufacturing and automation leader Siemens integrates OSHA-aligned safety practices across more than 190 sites in North America. In its 2024 sustainability report, Siemens emphasized workplace safety as a core pillar of operational excellence. The company has already begun auditing PPE fit issues and leveraging wearables and real-time heat monitoring tech at high-risk project sites.

DuPont: Chemical Safety Reinvented

As highlighted in DuPont’s 2024 Sustainability Report, the company is strengthening its commitment to chemical safety and regulatory alignment as part of its broader sustainability goals. In line with the evolving Hazard Communication Standard, DuPont has updated its hazard classification protocols and SDS systems to better align with GHS Revision 7. These updates are part of the company’s ongoing efforts to promote safer product stewardship, reduce environmental risk, and ensure transparency across its supply chain. DuPont is also enhancing internal training programs to reflect emerging classifications, reinforcing its position as a leader in responsible chemical management.

American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP): Industry Education Hub

The ASSP continues to play a critical role in bridging OSHA’s regulatory intent with on-the-ground application. Through webinars, technical reports (like the Z590.6 on PPE for women), and partnerships with equipment manufacturers, ASSP is equipping safety professionals with tools to implement inclusive, effective protection programs.

 

From Mandate to Movement

The OSHA 2025 regulations are more than legal mandates. It arrives at a pivotal moment for American workers as they're a mirror reflecting how seriously companies take employee well-being. From requiring properly fitting PPE to addressing heat hazards and modernizing hazard communication, the rules reflect a growing acknowledgment that one-size-fits-all safety no longer works. Organizations that respond with empathy, innovation, and inclusion will not only comply—they’ll lead.

Because safety isn’t just a rule—it’s a culture.


FAQs about OSHA’s 2025 Regulatory Changes

What are the new OSHA rules for 2025?

OSHA’s 2025 updates focus on inclusivity, climate adaptation, and proactive hazard prevention. New rules require accessible workplace designs, climate-specific protections (like heat and smoke safety), and predictive risk assessments. Employers must also conduct equity-focused safety audits and improve injury data reporting by demographics.

What is the #1 OSHA violation?

The most common OSHA violation remains inadequate fall protection in construction, particularly under standard 1926.501. This continues to cause serious injuries and fatalities due to unguarded edges and unsafe working surfaces. In 2025, OSHA is increasing enforcement and expanding requirements to account for weather-affected surfaces.

What is the new OSHA standard for fall protection?

The updated 2025 fall protection standard emphasizes smart PPE, climate-aware surface evaluations, and inclusive training. Employers must now use sensor-equipped harnesses and consider slippery or unstable surfaces due to weather. Training must also be accessible to diverse workers, including those with disabilities or limited English proficiency.

What are the OSHA regulations?

OSHA regulations are federal safety standards that protect workers across industries, including construction, general industry, maritime, and agriculture. They cover hazard prevention, training, and reporting. In 2025, OSHA’s approach is more proactive, tech-driven, and equity-oriented to address both traditional and emerging risks.


TRADESAFE provides premium industrial safety equipment, such as Lockout Tagout Devices, Eyewash Stations, Absorbents, and more; precision-engineered and trusted by professionals to offer unmatched performance in ensuring workplace safety.

 


The material provided in this article is for general information purposes only. It is not intended to replace professional/legal advice or substitute government regulations, industry standards, or other requirements specific to any business/activity. While we made sure to provide accurate and reliable information, we make no representation that the details or sources are up-to-date, complete or remain available. Readers should consult with an industrial safety expert, qualified professional, or attorney for any specific concerns and questions.

Herbert Post

Born in the Philadelphia area and raised in Houston by a family who was predominately employed in heavy manufacturing. Herb took a liking to factory processes and later safety compliance where he has spent the last 13 years facilitating best practices and teaching updated regulations. He is married with two children and a St Bernard named Jose. Herb is a self-described compliance geek. When he isn’t studying safety reports and regulatory interpretations he enjoys racquetball and watching his favorite football team, the Dallas Cowboys.

ENSURE SAFETY WITH PREMIUM SOLUTIONS